Predictive role of microsatellite instability for PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
- PMID: 33460964
- PMCID: PMC7815473
- DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2020.100036
Predictive role of microsatellite instability for PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Abstract
Background: Several post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggested the importance of microsatellite instability (MSI) as a positive predictive factor to immunotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC); however, individually these have low statistical power.
Methods: RCTs investigating treatment with or without an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) agent for advanced GC and providing outcome according to MSI status were selected. The hazard ratio (HR) and the odds ratio were used to compare the treatment effect on survival outcomes and tumor response, respectively, for anti-PD-1-based therapy compared with standard therapy. Evidence for treatment effect by MSI status was evaluated by a test of interaction.
Results: The phase III KEYNOTE-062, CheckMate-649, JAVELIN Gastric 100 and KEYNOTE-061 trials were included. A total of 2545 patients with evaluable MSI status were included and 123 (4.8%) had MSI-high cancers. The HR for overall survival benefit with anti-PD-1-based regimens was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.21-0.54) for MSI-high cancers versus 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-1.00] for microsatellite stable. The treatment effect was significantly different in the two subgroups (P for interaction 0.003). In the MSI-high subgroup, the HR for progression-free survival was 0.57 (95% CI: 0.33-0.97; P = 0.04) and the odds ratio for response was 1.76 (95% CI: 1.10-2.83; P = 0.02).
Conclusions: Patients with MSI-high GC should be regarded as a specific and highly immunosensitive population worthy of dedicated clinical trials.
Keywords: advanced gastric cancer; immune checkpoint inhibitors; meta-analysis; microsatellite instability; randomized clinical trials.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure FP reports personal fees from Amgen, Roche, Sanofi, Bayer, Servier, Merck-Serono, Lilly; advisory role with Amgen, Bayer, Servier, Merk-Serono and research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb. AIRC under IG 2019 - ID. 23624 project – P.I. Pietrantonio Filippo. JC reports grants and personal fees from Merck, Amgen, Macrogenics, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Foundation Medicine, Daiichi-Sankyo and Bristol Myers Squibb. ES reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Five Prime, Gritstone, Merck, Roche, Servier and Zymworks. The other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Prognostic and Predictive Value of Microsatellite Instability, Inflammatory Reaction and PD-L1 in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Either Adjuvant 5-FU/LV or Sequential FOLFIRI Followed by Cisplatin and Docetaxel: A Translational Analysis from the ITACA-S Trial.Oncologist. 2020 Mar;25(3):e460-e468. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0471. Epub 2019 Nov 25. Oncologist. 2020. PMID: 32162808 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes and a prognostic classifier in patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic gastric cancer receiving PD-1 blockade.J Immunother Cancer. 2023 Jun;11(6):e007104. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007104. J Immunother Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37277193 Free PMC article.
-
Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of the Value of Microsatellite Instability As a Biomarker in Gastric Cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 10;37(35):3392-3400. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01124. Epub 2019 Sep 12. J Clin Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31513484
-
Microsatellite instability-high status as a pan-cancer biomarker for immunotherapy efficacy.Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025 Feb 25;74(4):122. doi: 10.1007/s00262-025-03980-x. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025. PMID: 39998698 Free PMC article.
-
The Potential Value of Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancers: Review of the Evidence for Programmed Death-1 Inhibitor Therapy.Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016 Dec;15(4):285-291. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Jul 22. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27553906 Review.
Cited by
-
Identification of the diagnostic genes and immune cell infiltration characteristics of gastric cancer using bioinformatics analysis and machine learning.Front Genet. 2023 Jan 4;13:1067524. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1067524. eCollection 2022. Front Genet. 2023. PMID: 36685898 Free PMC article.
-
Recent insights into the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastric cancer.Porto Biomed J. 2022 Feb 8;7(1):e162. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000162. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr. Porto Biomed J. 2022. PMID: 35146175 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immunotherapy in Gastric Cancer.Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 2;29(3):1559-1574. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030131. Curr Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35323331 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A noninvasive nomogram model based on CT features to predict DNA mismatch repair deficiency in gastric cancer.Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 9;13:1066352. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1066352. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36969034 Free PMC article.
-
Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.Chin J Cancer Res. 2021 Apr 30;33(2):181-192. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.02.06. Chin J Cancer Res. 2021. PMID: 34158738 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Overman M.J., Lonardi S., Wong K.Y.M. Durable clinical benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in DNA mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(8):773–779. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous