Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr;23(2):159-169.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12970. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

On marginal bone level changes around dental implants

Affiliations
Review

On marginal bone level changes around dental implants

Pierluigi Coli et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Peri-implant bone level values have been used as the clinical standard of reference to describe the status of a dental implant, despite the fact that their significance for the long-term survival of the implant has never been properly assessed.

Purpose: To challenge the assumption that the natural course of peri-implant bone loss is the loss of the implant.

Materials and methods: This article is a narrative review on reasons and interpretations of marginal bone level changes around dental implants.

Results and conclusions: Different views regarding the pattern and progression of marginal bone loss depending on dental specialties have been identified. However, the present finding of a negative correlation between an increasing cumulative marginal bone loss and a decreasing risk of implant failures over time indicates that peri-implant marginal bone loss does not necessarily represent a condition of disease. Reduction of marginal bone levels may be observed in a majority of patients during follow-up time, with only a minority of those patients losing implants and implant-supported prostheses in the long term. Bone level changes seem often to occur as a consequence of physiological processes and/or as an adaptation to altered external as well as host response factors. Periodical radiological assessments of implant-restorations remain a valid diagnostic tool for the detection of potential implant fractures, loss of osseointegration, screws working loose and for the detection of the few cases with advanced, continuously progressing marginal bone loss during time. The detection of peri-implant marginal bone loss at one time point should not be immediately considered as a sign of ongoing pathology and of an increased risk of future loss of the implant in question.

Keywords: bone loss; cumulative survival rate; implant failure; marginal bone level; oral implants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. The Toronto Osseointegration Conference Revisited: The Toronto Osseointegration Conference Revisited: An interview with Dr. Asbjorn Jokstad. Osseointegration 2008;7-9.
    1. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1-132.
    1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10(6):387-416.
    1. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1(1):11-25.
    1. Faggion CM, Listl S, Tu YK. Assessment of endpoints in studies on peri-implantitis treatment: a systematic review. J Dent. 2010;38:443-450.

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources