On marginal bone level changes around dental implants
- PMID: 33463007
- DOI: 10.1111/cid.12970
On marginal bone level changes around dental implants
Abstract
Background: Peri-implant bone level values have been used as the clinical standard of reference to describe the status of a dental implant, despite the fact that their significance for the long-term survival of the implant has never been properly assessed.
Purpose: To challenge the assumption that the natural course of peri-implant bone loss is the loss of the implant.
Materials and methods: This article is a narrative review on reasons and interpretations of marginal bone level changes around dental implants.
Results and conclusions: Different views regarding the pattern and progression of marginal bone loss depending on dental specialties have been identified. However, the present finding of a negative correlation between an increasing cumulative marginal bone loss and a decreasing risk of implant failures over time indicates that peri-implant marginal bone loss does not necessarily represent a condition of disease. Reduction of marginal bone levels may be observed in a majority of patients during follow-up time, with only a minority of those patients losing implants and implant-supported prostheses in the long term. Bone level changes seem often to occur as a consequence of physiological processes and/or as an adaptation to altered external as well as host response factors. Periodical radiological assessments of implant-restorations remain a valid diagnostic tool for the detection of potential implant fractures, loss of osseointegration, screws working loose and for the detection of the few cases with advanced, continuously progressing marginal bone loss during time. The detection of peri-implant marginal bone loss at one time point should not be immediately considered as a sign of ongoing pathology and of an increased risk of future loss of the implant in question.
Keywords: bone loss; cumulative survival rate; implant failure; marginal bone level; oral implants.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
Clinical evaluation of a prospective multicenter study on 1-piece implants. part 1: marginal bone level evaluation after 1 year of follow-up.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Mar-Apr;22(2):226-34. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007. PMID: 17465347
-
Radiographic follow-up analysis of Brånemark dental implants.Swed Dent J Suppl. 2008;(194):5-69, 2. Swed Dent J Suppl. 2008. PMID: 18652086
-
Time dependent failure rate and marginal bone loss of implant supported prostheses: a 15-year follow-up study.Clin Oral Investig. 2000 Mar;4(1):13-20. doi: 10.1007/s007840050107. Clin Oral Investig. 2000. PMID: 11218510
-
Reasons for marginal bone loss around oral implants.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):792-807. doi: 10.1111/cid.12014. Epub 2012 Nov 30. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 23198697 Review.
-
Marginal bone level changes at dental implants after 5 years in function: a meta-analysis.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Mar;13(1):19-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00182.x. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011. PMID: 19681932 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical Outcomes of Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Short Implants Placed in Posterior Maxilla: A Case-Control Study.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13428. doi: 10.1111/cid.13428. Epub 2024 Dec 15. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 39676168 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of implant stability and marginal bone loss between osseodensification and conventional osteotomy at adjacent implant sites.J Dent Sci. 2025 Apr;20(2):1002-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.11.019. Epub 2024 Dec 10. J Dent Sci. 2025. PMID: 40224045 Free PMC article.
-
A Two-Year Follow-Up Assessment of Decreasing Crestal Bone Levels Around Dental Implants in Patients Rehabilitated With Mandibular Implant Overdentures.Cureus. 2022 Sep 11;14(9):e29044. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29044. eCollection 2022 Sep. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36237773 Free PMC article.
-
Numerical Analysis of Zirconium and Titanium Implants under the Effect of Critical Masticatory Load.Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;15(21):7843. doi: 10.3390/ma15217843. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36363435 Free PMC article.
-
Marginal bone loss and soft tissue health around two-implant mandibular overdenture retained with milled versus selective laser melted cobalt chromium bar: a randomized clinical trial.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 4;24(1):1180. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04883-6. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39367394 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
REFERENCES
-
- The Toronto Osseointegration Conference Revisited: The Toronto Osseointegration Conference Revisited: An interview with Dr. Asbjorn Jokstad. Osseointegration 2008;7-9.
-
- Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1-132.
-
- Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10(6):387-416.
-
- Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1(1):11-25.
-
- Faggion CM, Listl S, Tu YK. Assessment of endpoints in studies on peri-implantitis treatment: a systematic review. J Dent. 2010;38:443-450.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources