Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;30(1):5-13.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8918.

Summary of Current Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management of Abnormal Test Results: 2016-2020

Affiliations

Summary of Current Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management of Abnormal Test Results: 2016-2020

Rebecca B Perkins et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Cervical cancer can be prevented through routine screening and follow-up of abnormal results. Several guidelines have been published in the last 4 years from various medical societies and organizations. These guidelines aim to personalize screening and management, reducing unnecessary testing in low-risk patients and managing high-risk patients with more intensive follow-up. However, the resulting complexity can lead to confusion among providers. The CDC, NCI, and obstetrician-gynecologists involved in guideline development summarized current screening and management guidelines. For screening, guidelines for average-risk and high-risk populations are summarized and presented. For management, differences between the 2012 and 2019 consensus guidelines for managing abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors are summarized. Current screening guidelines for average-risk individuals have minor differences, but are evolving toward an HPV-based strategy. For management, HPV testing is preferred to cytology because it is a more sensitive test for cancer precursor detection and also allows for precise risk stratification. Current risk-based screening and management strategies can improve care by reducing unnecessary tests and procedures in low-risk patients and focusing resources on high-risk patients. Knowledge of screening and management guidelines is important to improve adherence and avoid both over- and under-use of screening and colposcopy.

Keywords: HPV tests; Pap tests; cervical cancer screening; follow-up of abnormal tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

R.B.P., Mona S., G.F.S., and S.F. have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Mark S. and N.W.: The National Cancer Institute has received cervical screening tests at reduced or no cost from Qiagen, Roche, BD, MobileODT, and Arbor Vita for independent evaluations of screening methods and strategies. R.L.G.: Inovio Pharmaceuticals DSMB, ASCCP Consultant.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Details questions that health care providers can ask to determine whether a patient qualifies for routine screening.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Summarizes the framework of the 2019 Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines. Color images are available online.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adegoke O, Kulasingam S, Virnig B. Cervical cancer trends in the United States: A 35-year population-based analysis. J Womens Health (2002) 2012;21:1031–1037 - PMC - PubMed
    1. SEER. Cancer stat facts: Cervical cancer. Published 2013. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html Accessed October5, 2020
    1. Schiffman MH, Castle P. Epidemiologic studies of a necessary causal risk factor: Human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:E2. - PubMed
    1. Castle PE, Kinney WK, Xue X, et al. . Effect of several negative rounds of human papillomavirus and cytology co-testing on safety against cervical cancer: An observational cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2018;168:20–29 - PubMed
    1. Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, et al. . 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2020;24:102–131 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types