Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0245459.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245459. eCollection 2021.

With or without internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: A meta-analysis

Qinying Huang  1   2 , Jinying Li  2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

With or without internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: A meta-analysis

Qinying Huang et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Although previously published meta-analyses have compared the surgical effects between the methods of Idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) removal with or without ILM peeling, they did not reach an agreement.

Purpose: We aimed to provide more evidence for the treatment of iERM and whether additional ILM peeling was better or not by analyzing more updated studies and randomized control trials (RCTs).

Method: The search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Open Grey without language limitation and the studies included were from inception to December 2019. All studies of iERM with or without ILM peeling showed at least one of outcomes, such as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and recurrence of ERM. The pooled results between above groups were showed by the mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Result: In total, 1645 eyes of five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and fifteen retrospective studies were included. The short-term (<12 months) BCVA improvement in both groups showed no significant difference (MD = -0.01; 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.01; P = 0.36). However, the BCVA improvement was significantly better in ILM peeling eyes than in those without ILM peeling when considering the risk bias (MD = -0.04; 95% CI = -0.07 to -0.01; P = 0.008). The short-term (<12 months) CMT had a higher reduction in non ILM peeling group (MD = -9.02; 95% CI = -12.51 to -5.54; P < 0.00001) and the recurrence of ERM in ILM peeling group was lower (P < 0.00001). The long-term (≥12months) BCVA improvement ((MD = -0.00; 95% CI = -0.03 to 0.03; P = 0.97) and reduction of long-term (≥12months) CMT (MD = -1.14; 95% CI = -7.14 to -4.86; P = 0.71) were similar in both groups.

Conclusion: By considering the risk of bias, we should determine whether ILM peeling is beneficial for short-term changes in BCVA in patients with iERM. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to confirm this. iERM removal without ILM peeling can improve the short-term decrease in CMT and ILM peeling decreases the recurrence of ERM, but the long-term changes in BCVA and CMT are similar with or without ILM peeling. There is a need for a true large scale randomized trial that will also include microperimetry and other functional measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The process of identifying eligible studies.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Meta-analysis comparing short-term (<12 months) (A) and long-term (≥12 months) (B) BCVA improvement between the groups with and without ILM peeling. BCVA is given as the logMAR.
Fig 3
Fig 3
The funnel plot of short-term (<12 months) (A) and long-term (≥12 months) (B) BCVA improvement between the groups with and without ILM peeling.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Meta-analysis comparing short-term (<12 months) (A) and long-term (≥12 months) (B) CMT reduction between the groups with and without ILM peeling.
Fig 5
Fig 5
The funnel plot of short-term (<12 months) (A) and long-term (≥12 months) (B) CMT reduction between the groups with and without ILM peeling.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Meta-analysis comparing the recurrence of ERM between the groups with and without ILM peeling.
Fig 7
Fig 7. The funnel plot of recurrence of ERM between the groups with and without ILM peeling.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Tari SR, Vidne-Hay O, Greenstein VC, Barile GR, Hood DC, Chang S. Functional and structural measurements for the assessment of internal limiting membrane peeling in idiopathic macular pucker. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2007;27(5):567–72. 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31802ea53d - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kritzenberger M, Junglas B, Framme C, Helbig H, Gabel VP, Fuchshofer R, et al. Different collagen types define two types of idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Histopathology. 2011;58(6):953–65. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03820.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bringmann A, Wiedemann P. Involvement of Muller glial cells in epiretinal membrane formation. Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2009;247(7):865–83. - PubMed
    1. Dal Vecchio M, Lavia C, Nassisi M, Grignolo FM, Fea AM. Microperimetric Assessment after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery: 4-Year Follow-Up. Journal of ophthalmology. 2016;2016:7030791 10.1155/2016/7030791 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suh MH, Seo JM, Park KH, Yu HG. Associations between macular findings by optical coherence tomography and visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane removal. American journal of ophthalmology. 2009;147(3):473–80.e3. 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.09.020 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types