. 2021 Jan 14;18(2):668.

doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020668.

Current Status and Future Prospects for Shared Decision Making Before and After Total Knee Replacement Surgery-A Scoping Review

Geert van der Sluis¹, Jelmer Jager^{2

3

4}, Ilona Punt^{5

6}, Alexandra Goldbohm⁷, Marjan J Meinders⁸, Richard Bimmel⁹, Nico L U van Meeteren^{10

11}, Maria W G Nijhuis-van Der Sanden⁸, Thomas J Hoogeboom⁸

Affiliations

¹ Department of Health Strategy and Innovation, Nij Smellinghe Hospital Drachten, Compagnonsplein 1, 9202 NN Drachten, The Netherlands.
² Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
³ Department of Physical Therapy, OLVG hospital Amsterdam, Oosterpark 9, 1091 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
⁴ Faculty of Health, University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Zernikedreef 11, 2333 CK Leiden, The Netherlands.
⁵ Department of Orthopaedics Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
⁶ Department of Surgery and Trauma Surgery and Research School NUTRIM, Maastricht University and Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
⁷ Retired, 0320 Lelystad, The Netherlands.
⁸ Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Geert Grooteplein 21, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
⁹ Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Nij Smellinghe Hospital Drachten, Compagnonsplein 1, 9202 NN Drachten, The Netherlands.
¹⁰ Topsector Life Sciences and Health (Health~Holland), Laan van Nieuw Oost-Indie 334, 2693 CE the Hague, The Netherlands.
¹¹ Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

PMID: 33466879
PMCID: PMC7829744
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020668

Current Status and Future Prospects for Shared Decision Making Before and After Total Knee Replacement Surgery-A Scoping Review

Geert van der Sluis et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021.

. 2021 Jan 14;18(2):668.

doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020668.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Department of Health Strategy and Innovation, Nij Smellinghe Hospital Drachten, Compagnonsplein 1, 9202 NN Drachten, The Netherlands.
² Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
³ Department of Physical Therapy, OLVG hospital Amsterdam, Oosterpark 9, 1091 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
⁴ Faculty of Health, University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Zernikedreef 11, 2333 CK Leiden, The Netherlands.
⁵ Department of Orthopaedics Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
⁶ Department of Surgery and Trauma Surgery and Research School NUTRIM, Maastricht University and Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
⁷ Retired, 0320 Lelystad, The Netherlands.
⁸ Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Geert Grooteplein 21, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
⁹ Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Nij Smellinghe Hospital Drachten, Compagnonsplein 1, 9202 NN Drachten, The Netherlands.
¹⁰ Topsector Life Sciences and Health (Health~Holland), Laan van Nieuw Oost-Indie 334, 2693 CE the Hague, The Netherlands.
¹¹ Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

PMID: 33466879
PMCID: PMC7829744
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020668

Abstract

Background. To gain insight into the current state-of-the-art of shared decision making (SDM) during decisions related to pre and postoperative care process regarding primary total knee replacement (TKR). Methods. A scoping review was performed to synthesize existing scientific research regarding (1) decisional needs and preferences of patients preparing for, undergoing and recovering from TKR surgery, (2) the relation between TKR decision-support interventions and SDM elements (i.e., team talk, option talk, and decision talk), (3) the extent to which TKR decision-support interventions address patients' decisional needs and preferences. Results. 2526 articles were identified, of which 17 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of the 17 articles, ten had a qualitative study design and seven had a quantitative study design. All included articles focused on the decision whether to undergo TKR surgery or not. Ten articles (all qualitative) examined patients' decisional needs and preferences. From these, we identified four domains that affected the patients' decision to undergo TKR: (1) personal factors, (2) external factors, (3) information sources and (4) preferences towards outcome prediction. Seven studies (5) randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) used quantitative analyses to probe the effect of decision aids on SDM and/or clinical outcomes. In general, existing decision aids did not appear to be tailored to patient needs and preferences, nor were the principles of SDM well-articulated in the design of decision aids. Conclusions. SDM in TKR care is understudied; existing research appears to be narrow in scope with limited relevance to established SDM principles and the decisional needs of patients undertaking TKR surgery.

Keywords: patient-centered care; shared decision making; total knee replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

**Figure 1**
Prisma flowchart of literature search strategy.

See this image and copyright information in PMC

Cited by

Impact of an in-consult patient decision aid on decisional quality, involvement, and health outcome for patients with severe hip or knee osteoarthritis - a study protocol for a multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial (PATI-study).
Pedersen TA, Lindberg-Larsen M, Jensen CM, Timm S, Steffensen KD, Varnum C. Pedersen TA, et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 2;26(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08856-w. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 40597226 Free PMC article.
21st century (clinical) decision support in nursing and allied healthcare. Developing a learning health system: a reasoned design of a theoretical framework.
van Velzen M, de Graaf-Waar HI, Ubert T, van der Willigen RF, Muilwijk L, Schmitt MA, Scheper MC, van Meeteren NLU. van Velzen M, et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Dec 5;23(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02372-4. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023. PMID: 38053104 Free PMC article. Review.
The achievement of pre-operative expectations in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: a cohort study evaluating unique patient goals.
Karunaratne S, Harris IA, Horsley M, Trevena L, Solomon M. Karunaratne S, et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jun 6;8(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00734-8. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024. PMID: 38842595 Free PMC article.
Physician and patient perceptions of surgical procedures for osteoarthritis of the knee in the United States, Europe, and Japan: results of a real-world study.
Fukui N, Conaghan PG, Togo K, Ebata N, Abraham L, Jackson J, Berry M, Cappelleri JC, Pandit H. Fukui N, et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):1065. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05954-x. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022. PMID: 36471384 Free PMC article.
Biopsychosocial Determinants for Total Knee Replacement Decisions Among Older Adults With Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review.
Lim CV, Harithasan D, Ahmad MAB, Mesbah N, Kumar S, Singh DKA. Lim CV, et al. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025 Apr 23;16:21514593251335882. doi: 10.1177/21514593251335882. eCollection 2025. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025. PMID: 40297342 Free PMC article. Review.

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. Barry M.J., Edgman-Levitan S. Shared Decision Making—The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care. New Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:780–781. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1109283. - DOI - PubMed
1. Elwyn G., Durand M.A., Song J., Aarts J., Barr P.J., Berger Z., Cochran N., Frosch D., Galasiński D., Gulbrandsen P., et al. A three-talk model for shared decision making: Multistage consultation process. BMJ. 2017:1–7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4891. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Dawes M., Summerskill W.S.M., Glasziou P., Cartabellotta A., Martin J., Hopayian K., Porzsolt F., Burls A., Osborne J. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ. 2005;5:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Hawker G.A., Badley E.M., Borkhoff C.M., Croxford R., Davis A.M., Dunn S., Gignac M.A., Jaglal S.B., Kreder H.J., Sale J.E.M. Which Patients Are Most Likely to Benefit From Total Joint Arthroplasty? Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:1243–1252. doi: 10.1002/art.37901. - DOI - PubMed
1. Beswick A.D., Wylde V., Gooberman-Hill R., Blom A., Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
- scite Smart Citations
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information
Miscellaneous
- NCI CPTAC Assay Portal

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Current Status and Future Prospects for Shared Decision Making Before and After Total Knee Replacement Surgery-A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Current Status and Future Prospects for Shared Decision Making Before and After Total Knee Replacement Surgery-A Scoping Review

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement

Figures

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources

Medical

Miscellaneous