Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 14;18(2):682.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020682.

A Psychoacoustic Approach to Building Knowledge about Human Response to Noise of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Affiliations
Review

A Psychoacoustic Approach to Building Knowledge about Human Response to Noise of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Antonio J Torija et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

We are on the cusp of a revolution in the aviation sector, driven by the significant progress in electric power and battery technologies, and autonomous systems. Several industry leaders and governmental agencies are currently investigating the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), or "drones" as commonly known, for an ever-growing number of applications-from blue light services to parcel delivery and urban mobility. Undoubtedly, the operation of UAVs will lead to noise exposure, which has the potential to become a significant public health issue. This paper first describes the main acoustic and operational characteristics of UAVs, as an unconventional noise source compared to conventional civil aircraft. Gaps in the literature and the regulations on the noise metrics and acceptable noise levels are identified and discussed. The state-of-the-art evidence on human response to aircraft and other environmental noise sources is reviewed and its application for UAVs discussed. A methodological framework is proposed for building psychoacoustic knowledge, to inform systems and operations development to limit the noise impact on communities.

Keywords: community noise impact; drone noise; health effects of noise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency spectra of two conventional aircraft (Airbus A320 and Boeing 737-8MAX) and two multi-copter Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (DJI M200 and Yuneec Typhoon [9]). Frequency spectra normalised to 65 dB(A).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Spectrogram of the DJI M200 (a) and Yuneec Typhoon (b) UAVs flying over at ~50 m (~150 ft) altitude above the microphone [9].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Spectrogram of the DJI M200 (a) and Yuneec Typhoon (b) UAVs hovering at ~1.2 m (~4 ft) altitude above the microphone [9].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schäfer A.W., Barrett S.R.H., Doyme K., Dray L.M., Gnadt A.R., Self R., O’Sullivan A., Synodinos A.P., Torija A.J. Technological, economic and environmental prospects of all-electric aircraft. Nat. Energy. 2019;4:160–166. doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0294-x. - DOI
    1. Mahony R., Kumar V. Aerial Robotics and the Quadrotor. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 2012;19:19. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2012.2208151. - DOI
    1. Colomina I., Molina P. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014;92:79–97. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013. - DOI
    1. Elsayed M., Mohamed M. The impact of airspace regulations on unmanned aerial vehicles in last-mile operation. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020;87:102480. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102480. - DOI
    1. Ackerman E., Strickland E. Medical delivery drones take flight in east africa. IEEE Spectr. 2018;55:34–35. doi: 10.1109/MSPEC.2018.8241731. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources