Factors Associated with Decisions for Initial Dosing, Up-Titration of Propiverine and Treatment Outcomes in Overactive Bladder Syndrome Patients in a Non-Interventional Setting
- PMID: 33467690
- PMCID: PMC7830207
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020311
Factors Associated with Decisions for Initial Dosing, Up-Titration of Propiverine and Treatment Outcomes in Overactive Bladder Syndrome Patients in a Non-Interventional Setting
Abstract
Two doses of propiverine ER (30 and 45 mg/d) are available for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome. We have explored factors associated with the initial dosing choice (allocation bias), the decision to adapt dosing (escalation bias) and how dosing relative to other factors affects treatment outcomes. Data from two non-interventional studies of 1335 and 745 OAB patients, respectively, receiving treatment with propiverine, were analyzed post-hoc. Multivariate analysis was applied to identify factors associated with dosing decisions and treatment outcomes. Several parameters were associated with dose choice, escalation to higher dose or treatment outcomes, but only few exhibited a consistent association across both studies. These were younger age for initial dose choice and basal number of urgency and change in incontinence episodes for up-titration. Treatment outcome (difference between values at 12 weeks vs. baseline) for each OAB system was strongly driven by the respective baseline value, whereas no other parameter exhibited a consistent association. Patients starting on the 30 mg dose and escalating to 45 mg after 4 weeks had outcomes comparable with those staying on a starting dose of 30 or 45 mg. We conclude that dose escalation after 4 weeks brings OAB patients with an initially limited improvement to a level seen in initially good responders. Analysis of underlying factors yielded surprisingly little consistent insight.
Keywords: allocation bias; dose-titration; escalation bias; overactive bladder syndrome; propiverine.
Conflict of interest statement
M.A. does not report a conflict of interest. T.S. is a lecturer for Allergan, Apogepha, Pfizer and Takeda. M.O. is a speaker and/or trial participant for Apogepha, Astellas, Dr. Willmar Schwabe, Ferring GSK, Omega Pharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabere, SAJA Pharmaceuticals and SUN Pharmaceuticals. S.M. is an employee of Apogepha. In the urology field, M.C.M. is a consultant and/or lecturer to/for Apogepha, Astellas, Willmar Schwabe, Ferring, GSK and Velicept; he is also a shareholder of Velicept. Employees of the funder recruited participating physicians and distributed and collected case record forms. S.M. worked on the project as part of her employment by the funder. Other than that, the funder had no role in the analysis or interpretation of the data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Jünemann K.P., Hessdörfer E., Unamba-Oparah I., Berse M., Brünjes R., Madersbacher H., Gramatté T. Propiverine hydrochloride immediate and extended release: Comparison of efficacy and tolerability in patients with overactive bladder. Urol. Int. 2006;77:334–339. doi: 10.1159/000096338. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
