Talking but not always understanding: couple communication about infertility concerns after cancer
- PMID: 33468106
- PMCID: PMC7816453
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10188-y
Talking but not always understanding: couple communication about infertility concerns after cancer
Abstract
Background: Cancer related infertility can have an impact on couple relationships, with evidence that couple communication facilitates coping. However, little is known about the ways in which couples communicate about cancer-related fertility concerns. The aim of this article is to examine couple communication about fertility concerns in the context of cancer, and the perceived quality of such communication from the perspective of cancer survivors and their partners.
Methods: Eight-hundred and seventy-eight cancer survivors (693 women, 185 men) and 144 partners (82 women, 62 men), across a range of tumour types and age groups, completed a survey which examined cancer related fertility concerns. Seventy-eight survivors (61 women and 17 men), and 26 partners (13 women and 13 men), participated in semi-structured interviews, in order to examine the subjective experience of fertility concerns in-depth. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interviews and open ended survey questions. Valid percentages for single items from the relationships subscale of the Fertility Preservation Inventory (FPI) related to qualitative themes, identified frequency of responses.
Results: The major theme was 'talking but not always understanding". 89.6% of cancer survivors and partners (95.1%) reported working well together handling fertility questions (FPI), but agreed that communication could be improved (65.9% survivors; 65% partners). Open and honest couple communication was associated with feelings of support, understanding and relationship growth, including perception of partner comfort (79.2% survivors, 81.6% partners). However, 32% survivors and 31.1% partners concealed fertility concerns to avoid upsetting their partner, or reported that their partner doesn't understand their fertility concerns (survivors 25.5%, partners 14.6%), with 14.1% of cancer survivors and 19.4% partners reporting fear of relationship breakdown because of fertility issues. Fear of rejection when forming new relationships, and concerns about how to talk to future partners, was reported by non-partnered individuals.
Conclusion: Health-care professionals should include partners of cancer survivors in fertility discussions. Couple interventions developed in general psycho-oncology should be extended to the domain of fertility, in order to facilitate effective couple communication. Communication in future relationships needs to be addressed for single people and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) who have fertility concerns.
Keywords: Cancer; Cancer survivorship; Couple communication; Fertility; Infertility; Oncofertility; Relationships.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
The impact of cancer-related fertility concerns on current and future couple relationships: People with cancer and partner perspectives.Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Jan;30(1):e13348. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13348. Epub 2020 Oct 20. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021. PMID: 33084134
-
A comparison of heterosexual and LGBTQ cancer survivors' outlooks on relationships, family building, possible infertility, and patient-doctor fertility risk communication.J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Oct;10(5):935-42. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0524-9. Epub 2016 Feb 18. J Cancer Surviv. 2016. PMID: 26887847
-
Need for information, honesty and respect: patient perspectives on health care professionals communication about cancer and fertility.Reprod Health. 2018 Jan 5;15(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0441-z. Reprod Health. 2018. PMID: 29304873 Free PMC article.
-
Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):390-417. Dan Med Bull. 2006. PMID: 17150146 Review.
-
Psychosocial oncofertility issues faced by adolescents and young adults over their lifetime: a review of the research.Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013 Mar;16(1):59-63. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2012.733480. Epub 2013 Feb 5. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013. PMID: 23009083 Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding and Supporting Informal Cancer Caregivers.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):494-513. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00955-3. Epub 2022 Mar 14. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35286571 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Self-disclosure and reproductive concerns among breast cancer female patients: the chain mediation model of couples' cancer-related communication problems and relationship intimacy.Support Care Cancer. 2025 Mar 12;33(4):272. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09331-x. Support Care Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40072665
-
Opening the Conversation: study protocol for a Phase III trial to evaluate a couple-based intervention to reduce reproductive and sexual distress among young adult breast and gynecologic cancer survivor couples.Trials. 2022 Sep 2;23(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06665-3. Trials. 2022. PMID: 36056413 Free PMC article.
-
Adapting a Theory-Informed Intervention to Help Young Adult Couples Cope With Reproductive and Sexual Concerns After Cancer.Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 4;13:813548. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813548. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35185733 Free PMC article.
-
Oncofertility care and influencing factors among cancer patients of reproductive age from Saudi Arabia.Front Reprod Health. 2022 Nov 17;4:1014868. doi: 10.3389/frph.2022.1014868. eCollection 2022. Front Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 36466012 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kayser K, Watson LE, Andrade JT. Cancer as a "we-disease": examining the process of coping from a relational perspective. Fam Syst Health. 2007;25(4):404–418. doi: 10.1037/1091-7527.25.4.404. - DOI
-
- Chambers S, Girgis A, Occhipinti S, Hutchison S, Turner J, McDowell M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of psychological intervention for high distress Cancer patients and Carers. Psycho-Oncology. 2014;23:47. doi: 10.1002/pon.3391. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical