Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;13(1):41-73.
doi: 10.1007/s12652-020-02883-2. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

Accurate detection of Covid-19 patients based on Feature Correlated Naïve Bayes (FCNB) classification strategy

Affiliations

Accurate detection of Covid-19 patients based on Feature Correlated Naïve Bayes (FCNB) classification strategy

Nehal A Mansour et al. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2022.

Abstract

The outbreak of Coronavirus (COVID-19) has spread between people around the world at a rapid rate so that the number of infected people and deaths is increasing quickly every day. Accordingly, it is a vital process to detect positive cases at an early stage for treatment and controlling the disease from spreading. Several medical tests had been applied for COVID-19 detection in certain injuries, but with limited efficiency. In this study, a new COVID-19 diagnosis strategy called Feature Correlated Naïve Bayes (FCNB) has been introduced. The FCNB consists of four phases, which are; Feature Selection Phase (FSP), Feature Clustering Phase (FCP), Master Feature Weighting Phase (MFWP), and Feature Correlated Naïve Bayes Phase (FCNBP). The FSP selects only the most effective features among the extracted features from laboratory tests for both COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 people by using the Genetic Algorithm as a wrapper method. The FCP constructs many clusters of features based on the selected features from FSP by using a novel clustering technique. These clusters of features are called Master Features (MFs) in which each MF contains a set of dependent features. The MFWP assigns a weight value to each MF by using a new weight calculation method. The FCNBP is used to classify patients based on the weighted Naïve Bayes algorithm with many modifications as the correlation between features. The proposed FCNB strategy has been compared to recent competitive techniques. Experimental results have proven the effectiveness of the FCNB strategy in which it outperforms recent competitive techniques because it achieves the maximum (99%) detection accuracy.

Keywords: COVID-19; Classification; Correlation; FCNB; Feature selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
COVID-19 epidemic curve with and without protective measures
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Different COVID-19 diagnosis techniques
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The proposed FCNB classification strategy
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The steps of FSGA implementation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The followed steps for the first iteration of FSGA
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The followed steps for the second iteration of FSGA
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
The main steps for clustering the features to construct Master Features
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
The initial construction of the clusters
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
The steps of assigning each isolated feature to its nearest cluster or to a new dummy cluster
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
The steps of implementing the proposed feature correlation methodology
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
The total number of cases according to age
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
The total number of COVID-19 cases according to age and gender
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
The presentation of COVID-19 cases and un COVID-19 cases distribution
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
Accuracy of different feature selection techniques
Fig. 15
Fig. 15
Error of different feature selection techniques
Fig. 16
Fig. 16
Precision of different feature selection techniques
Fig. 17
Fig. 17
Recall of different feature selection techniques
Fig. 18
Fig. 18
Macro-average precision of different feature selection techniques
Fig. 19
Fig. 19
Macro-average recall of different feature selection techniques
Fig. 20
Fig. 20
Micro-average precision of different feature selection techniques
Fig. 21
Fig. 21
Micro-average recall of different feature selection techniques
Fig. 22
Fig. 22
F-measure of different feature selection techniques
Fig. 23
Fig. 23
Run time of different feature selection techniques
Fig. 24
Fig. 24
Accuracy of different COVID-19 classification techniques\
Fig. 25
Fig. 25
Error of different COVID-19 classification techniques
Fig. 26
Fig. 26
Precision of different COVID-19 classification techniques
Fig. 27
Fig. 27
Recall of different COVID-19 classification techniques
Fig. 28
Fig. 28
Macro-average for precision of different COVID-19 classification techniques
Fig. 29
Fig. 29
Macro-average for recall of different COVID-19 classification techniques
Fig. 30
Fig. 30
Micro-average precision of different COVID-19 classification techniques
Fig. 31
Fig. 31
Micro-average recall of different COVID-19 classification techniques
Fig. 32
Fig. 32
F-measure of different COVID-19 classification techniques
Fig. 33
Fig. 33
Run time of the different classification techniques

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abellán J, Castellano J. Improving the naive bayes classifier via a quick variable selection method using maximum of entropy. Entropy. 2017;19(6):1–17.
    1. Alazab M, Awajan A, Mesleh A, Abraham A, et al. COVID-19 prediction and detection using deep learning. Int J Comput Inf Syst Ind Manag Appl. 2020;12:168–181.
    1. Ali ZH, Ali HA. QoS provisioning framework for service-oriented internet of things (IoT) Clust Comput. 2020;23:575–591.
    1. Arunadevi J, Ganeshamoorthi K, Rampriya R. Application of feature weighting for the intensification of data classification. IJITEE. 2019;9:879–887.
    1. Ayed A, Halima M, Alimi A (2015) Survey on clustering methods: towards fuzzy clustering for big data. In: Proceedings of the 2014 6th international conference of soft computing and pattern recognition (SoCPaR). IEEE, Tunis, Tunisia, pp 331–336

LinkOut - more resources