Do length and gauge of dental needle affect success in performing an inferior alveolar nerve block during extraction of adult mandibular molars? A prospective, randomized observer-blind, clinical trial
- PMID: 33469717
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03796-w
Do length and gauge of dental needle affect success in performing an inferior alveolar nerve block during extraction of adult mandibular molars? A prospective, randomized observer-blind, clinical trial
Abstract
Objective: Association between length and gauge of dental needle and success rate and pain perception during an inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) has not been investigated using a randomized clinical trial (RCT). This RCT aimed to compare the success rate of IANB and perceived pain using 27- or 30-gauge needles for the extraction of adult mandibular molars.
Material and method: A prospective RCT was conducted on two hundred and twelve adult patients requiring extraction of mandibular molars using standard methods as described by Malamed with 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline. One hundred six patients received IANB using 27-gauge needles (32 mm × 0.2 mm) and one hundred six patients received IANB using 30-gauge needles (25 mm × 0.15 mm). Predictor variables were 27-gauge and short and 30-gauge. Outcome variables were the success rate of IANB and pain perception during injection using a visual analogue scale.
Results: There was a highly significantly increase in the success of IANB using 27-gauge needle (95.28%) versus 30-gauge needle (41.51%) (P = 0.001). There was a significant increase in pain perception for patients who received IANB by shorter and thinner needle (30-gauge) when compared to the long and thicker needle (27-gauge).
Conclusion: This RCT demonstrated that 27-gauge needle seems to be associated with a higher success rate of IANB and lower pain perception during injection when compared to 30-gauge needle in the extraction of adult mandibular molars when compared to 30-gauge needles.
Clinical relevance: For adult patients, when thickness of soft tissue to be penetrated is essential to achieve bony contact, long or large gauge dental needle is preferred to get a higher success rate of IANB with less pain perception during injection.
Keywords: Inferior alveolar nerve block; Mandibular molars; Randomized clinical trial.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block and inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal or lingual infiltration using articaine in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a preliminary prospective randomized single-blind clinical trial.Quintessence Int. 2021 Sep 9;52(9):820-826. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b1864321. Quintessence Int. 2021. PMID: 34369941 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Supplemental Infiltration for Mandibular First versus Second Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.J Endod. 2018 Apr;44(4):523-528. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.003. Epub 2018 Feb 1. J Endod. 2018. PMID: 29397214 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.J Endod. 2014 Jun;40(6):753-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.022. Epub 2014 Feb 8. J Endod. 2014. PMID: 24862701 Clinical Trial.
-
Can buccal infiltration of articaine replace traditional inferior alveolar nerve block for the treatment of mandibular molars in pediatric patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 Nov 1;26(6):e754-e761. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24726. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021. PMID: 34564678 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of different mandibular blocks for the removal of lower third molars: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):2129-2139. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03525-9. Epub 2020 Aug 25. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 32839834
Cited by
-
Observational and descriptive analysis of broken dental needles: a case series.Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Sep;27(3):433-443. doi: 10.1007/s10006-022-01078-7. Epub 2022 Jun 6. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023. PMID: 35661006
-
The effect of replacing dental needles between subsequent inferior alveolar nerve blocks on pain and trismus - a double blinded, randomised split-mouth study.J Clin Exp Dent. 2025 Jan 1;17(1):e29-e36. doi: 10.4317/jced.61784. eCollection 2025 Jan. J Clin Exp Dent. 2025. PMID: 39958250 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal needle characteristics for classical inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia: a systematic review.Head Face Med. 2025 Feb 3;21(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00481-1. Head Face Med. 2025. PMID: 39901265 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sirin Y, Humphris G, Sencan S, Firat D (2012) What is the most fearful intervention in ambulatory oral surgery? Analysis of an outpatient clinic. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:1284–1290 - PubMed
-
- Oosterink FM, de Jongh A, Aartman IH (2008) What are people afraid of during dental treatment? Anxiety-provoking capacity of 67 stimuli characteristic of the dental setting. Eur J Oral Sci 116:44–51 - PubMed
-
- Astramskaite I, Poskevicius L, Juodzbalys G (2016) Factors determining tooth extraction anxiety and fear in adult dental patients: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:1630–1643 - PubMed
-
- van Wijk A, Lindeboom JA, de Jongh A, Tuk JG, Hoogstraten J (2012) Pain related to mandibular block injections and its relationship with anxiety and previous experiences with dental anesthetics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114:S114–S119 - PubMed
-
- Sokolowski CJ, Giovannitti JA Jr, Boynes SG (2010) Needle phobia: etiology, adverse consequences, and patient management. Dent Clin N Am 54:731–744 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources