Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;36(4):1011-1016.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06579-3. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

The Gender of COVID-19 Experts in Newspaper Articles: a Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

The Gender of COVID-19 Experts in Newspaper Articles: a Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

Sarah Fletcher et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Pre-existing gender-based disparities in academia may have worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Being cited as an expert source in newspaper articles about COVID-19 may increase an individual's research or leadership profile. In addition, visibility in a newspaper article is an important component of representation in academia.

Objective: To determine whether women were underrepresented as COVID-19 expert sources in print newspapers in the USA.

Design: We undertook a cross-sectional study of English-language newspaper articles that addressed the COVID-19 pandemic and that were published in the top 10 most widely read newspapers in the USA between April 1 and April 15, 2020.

Main measures: We extracted the names of all people cited as expert sources and categorized the gender of each expert source based on pronoun usage within the article or on a business, university, or organization website. The professional role of each expert was assigned based on their description in the article.

Key results: Of 2297 expert sources identified, 35.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 33.9-37.8%; n = 824) were women and 63.7% were men (95% CI 61.8-65.7%; n = 1464). This result was similar when considering unique experts in each newspaper and for all included newspapers; of the 1738 unique experts per newspaper, 34.6% were women (95% CI 32.3-36.8%; n = 601), and of the 1593 unique experts in all newspapers, 36.5% were women (95% CI 34.1-38.9%; n = 581). Of articles with multiple experts referenced (n = 374), 102 cited only men experts (27.3%) and 44 cited only women experts (11.8%). Women were underrepresented as experts as Healthcare Workers and Professionals, Non-STEM Experts, Public Health Leaders, and STEM Scientists. There were no differences in the proportion of women experts between newspapers or between different regions of the USA.

Conclusions: Altogether, our findings support that men academics outnumber women as COVID-19 experts in newspaper articles.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; expertise; gender-based disparities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

References

    1. Carr T. Coronavirus coverage and the silencing of female expertise. Undark. 2020;22:2020.
    1. Andersen JP, Nielsen MW, Simone NL, Lewiss RE, Jagsi R. Meta-Research: COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected. eLife. 2020;9:e58807. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gabster BP, van Daalen K, Dhatt R, Barry M. Challenges for the female academic during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rajan D, Koch K, Rohrer K, Bajnoczki C, Socha A, Voss M, et al. Governance of the Covid-19 response: a call for more inclusive and transparent decision-making. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(5). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kitzinger J, Chimba M, Williams A, Haran J, Boyce T. Gender, Stereotypes and Expertise in the Press: How Newspapers Represent Female and Male Scientists. Engineering and Technology: UK Resource Centre for Women in Science; 2008.

LinkOut - more resources