Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 May 1;35(5):252-258.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001978.

Reverse or Hemi Shoulder Arthroplasty in Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Single-Blinded Prospective Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Niels Laas  1 , Yde Engelsma  1 , Frans J A Hagemans  1 , Max A Hoelen  2 , Derek F P van Deurzen  3 , Bart J Burger  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Reverse or Hemi Shoulder Arthroplasty in Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Single-Blinded Prospective Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Niels Laas et al. J Orthop Trauma. .

Abstract

Objectives: To compare outcomes between hemiarthroplasty (HA) and reversed shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) as a treatment for dislocated 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly population.

Design: Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Three Level-1 trauma centers.

Patients/participants: This study included 31 patients of which 14 were randomized into the HA group and 17 into the RSA group.

Intervention: Patients randomized to the HA group were treated with a cemented-stem Aequalis-fracture HA and patients randomized to the RSA group with a cemented-stem Aequalis-fracture RSA.

Main outcome measurements: Primary outcomes consisted of range of motion and constant score. Secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale for pain, DASH score, SF-12 scores, and radiographic outcomes.

Results: After 6 and 12 months of follow-up, RSA showed a significant higher anterior elevation (105 degrees vs. 80 degrees, P = 0.002 and 110 degrees vs. 90 degrees, P = 0.02, respectively) and constant score (60 vs. 41, P = 0.01 and 51 vs. 32, P = 0.05, respectively) compared with HA. There were no significant differences in external and internal rotation. Also, visual analog scale pain, DASH scores, SF-12 scores, and radiological healing of the tuberosities and heterotopic ossification did not show any significant differences between groups.

Conclusion: RSA showed significant superior functional outcomes for anterior elevation and constant score compared with HA for dislocated 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures after short-term follow-up.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, et al. Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2008;17:42–54.
    1. Kontakis G, Koutras C, Tosounidis T, et al. Early management of proximal humeral fractures with hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2008;90:1407–1413.
    1. Bell J-E, Leung BC, Spratt KF, et al. Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011;93:121–131.
    1. Mauro CS. Proximal humeral fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2011;4:214–220.
    1. Jobin CM, Galatz LM. Proximal humerus fractures: pin, plate, or replace?. Semin Arthroplasty. 2012;23:74–82.

Publication types