Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;26(2):e1892.
doi: 10.1002/pri.1892. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

Agreement and reliability of repeated bedside respiratory muscle strength measurements in acute and subacute stroke

Agnieszka Lewko  1 , Marta Sidaway  2   3 , Stefan Tino Kulnik  1 , Maciej Krawczyk  2   3
Affiliations

Agreement and reliability of repeated bedside respiratory muscle strength measurements in acute and subacute stroke

Agnieszka Lewko et al. Physiother Res Int. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Many stroke trials include maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) outcome measurements. However, data on agreement and reliability of repeated MIP, MEP, and SNIP measurements in acute and subacute stroke patients are scarce.

Methods: This study employed a test-retest design. Eighteen patients (seven female) with mean (SD) age 59 (14.5) years were recruited from neurological wards. Median (range) time since first stroke was 50.5 (21-128) days. MIP, MEP, and SNIP were measured repeatedly in three testing sessions (S1-3) conducted within 24 h and following international standards. Intra-rater agreement between testing sessions was analyzed using the Bland-Altman method. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Association between individual measurement variability, time poststroke, and level of stroke impairment was analyzed using Spearman's rho.

Results: Mean difference and 95% limits of agreement for MIP were -0.40 (-23.02, 22.22) cmH2 O between S1 and S2, and 2.14 (-12.79, 16.99) cmH2 O between S2 and S3; for MEP, -4.56 (-29.01, 19.90) cmH2 O between S1 and S2, and 0.29 (-24.28, 24.87) cmH2 O between S2 and S3; and for SNIP, -10.56 (-38.48, 17.37) cmH2 O between S1 and S2, and -6.06 (-27.32, 15.20) cmH2 O between S2 and S3. ICCs for MIP, MEP, and SNIP were ≥0.9 throughout. There were no strong correlations between individual measurement variability and time poststroke or level of stroke impairment.

Discussion: MIP, MEP, and SNIP in acute and subacute stroke patients show good test-retest reliability for group averages; however, absolute agreement can vary considerably for some individuals.

Keywords: agreement; maximal mouth pressure; reliability; respiratory muscle strength; smallest detectable change; standard error of measurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. (2002). ATS/ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 166(4), 518-624. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.166.4.518
    1. Banks, J. L. , & Marotta, C. A. (2007). Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: Implications for stroke clinical trials: A literature review and synthesis. Stroke, 38(3), 1091-1096. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6
    1. Bland, J. M. , & Altman, D. G. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(2), 135-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204
    1. Bonett, D. G. (2002). Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Statistics in Medicine, 21(9), 1331-1335. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1108
    1. Carr, J. H. , Shepherd, R. B. , Nordholm, L. , & Lynne, D. (1985). Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physical Therapy, 65(2), 175-180. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/65.2.175

LinkOut - more resources