Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;115(2):460-480.
doi: 10.1002/jeab.671. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

Exploring a Training IRAP as a single participant context for analyzing reversed derived relations and persistent rule-following

Affiliations

Exploring a Training IRAP as a single participant context for analyzing reversed derived relations and persistent rule-following

Colin Harte et al. J Exp Anal Behav. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Rule-governed behavior and derived stimulus relations have always shared strong conceptual links within behavior analysis. However, experimental analysis linking the two domains remains limited. The current study consisted of three experiments that aimed to continue to bridge this experimental gap. The first experiment sought to establish the extent to which a training version of the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) could be used to establish and successfully reverse experimentally established derived relations. The results suggested that the Training IRAP could successfully produce derived reversals. Experiments 2 and 3 explored the extent to which reversed derived relations would control rule-governed behavior when the contingencies for rule-following competed with the rule. In Experiment 2, the task contingencies were immediately in opposition to the (reversed) derived rule, and participants generally responded in accordance with the task contingencies, rather than the rule. In Experiment 3, the task contingencies were initially rule-consistent before a contingency reversal that later made them rule-inconsistent. Here evidence of rule-persistence emerged. The results of the research are considered within the context of a recent framework that has emerged out of RFT for analyzing the dynamics involved in derived relational responding.

Keywords: HDML; coherence; derived relations; flexibility; rule-following; single participant design.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arantes, A., & de Rose, J. C. (2015). High probability of equivalence class formation with both sample-s+ and sample-s- controlling relations in baseline. The Psychological Record, 65, 743-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0143-2
    1. Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Luciano, C., & McEnteggart, C. (2017). From IRAP and REC model to a multi-dimensional multi-level framework for analyzing the dynamics of arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(4), 473-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.08.001
    1. Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McEnteggart, C. (2020). Updating RFT (more field than frame) and its implications for process-based therapy. The Psychological Record, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00372-3
    1. Belisle, J., & Dixon, M. R. (2020a). An exploratory analysis of relational density theory: Relational resistance and gravity. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 16, 80-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.01.013
    1. Belisle, J., & Dixon, M. R. (2020b). Relational density theory: Nonlinearity of Equivalence relating examined through higher-order volumetric-mass-density. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43, 259-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-020-00248-w

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources