Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 20;20(1):40.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01330-0.

Urban poverty and nutrition challenges associated with accessibility to a healthy diet: a global systematic literature review

Affiliations

Urban poverty and nutrition challenges associated with accessibility to a healthy diet: a global systematic literature review

Mireya Vilar-Compte et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing global trend towards urbanization. In general, there are less food access issues in urban than rural areas, but this "urban advantage" does not benefit the poorest who face disproportionate barriers to accessing healthy food and have an increased risk of malnutrition.

Objectives: This systematic literature review aimed to assess urban poverty as a determinant of access to a healthy diet, and to examine the contribution of urban poverty to the nutritional status of individuals.

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) methodology, our review included quantitative and qualitative studies published in English or in Spanish between 2000 and 2019. The articles were eligible if they focused on nutrition access (i.e. access to a healthy diet) or nutrition outcomes (i.e., anemia, overweight and obesity, micronutrient deficiency, micronutrient malnutrition) among urban poor populations. Articles were excluded if they did not meet pre-established criteria. The quality of the quantitative studies was assessed by applying Khan et al.'s methodology. Similarly, we assessed the quality of qualitative articles through an adapted version of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) methodology checklist. Finally, we systematically analyzed all papers that met the inclusion criteria based on a qualitative content and thematic analysis.

Results: Of the 68 papers included in the systematic review, 55 used quantitative and 13 used qualitative methods. Through the analysis of the literature we found four key themes: (i) elements that affect access to healthy eating in individuals in urban poverty, (ii) food insecurity and urban poverty, (iii) risk factors for the nutritional status of urban poor and (iv) coping strategies to limited access to food. Based on the systematization of the literature on these themes, we then proposed a conceptual framework of urban poverty and nutrition.

Conclusions: This systematic review identified distinct barriers posed by urban poverty in accessing healthy diets and its association with poorer nutrition outcomes, hence, questioning the "urban advantage". A conceptual framework emerging from the existing literature is proposed to guide future studies and policies.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42018089788 .

Keywords: Food security; Nutrition; Public health; Social protection; Urban poverty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Access measures and nutrition outcomes used as dependent variables in quantitative studies. Note: Some studies used more than one measure and/or outcome
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Conceptual Framework of nutrition and urban poverty

References

    1. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs . 2018 revision of world urbanization prospects: United Nations. 2018.
    1. UN Development Programme. Sustainable urbanization strategy: UNDP’S support to sustainable, inclusive and resilient cities in the developing world. New York City; 2016.
    1. Davenport S, Carneiro PT. Governance for development: World Bank. 2015.
    1. UN . Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/RES/70/1. 2015.
    1. Pérez-Escamilla R. Food security and the 2015-2030 sustainable development goals: from human to planetary health: perspectives and opinions. Curr Dev Nutr. 2017;1(7):e000513. doi: 10.3945/cdn.117.000513. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms