Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Apr 1;27(7):1882-1892.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3946. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

Phase I Trial of DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitor Guadecitabine Combined with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine for Solid Malignancies Including Urothelial Carcinoma (SPIRE)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase I Trial of DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitor Guadecitabine Combined with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine for Solid Malignancies Including Urothelial Carcinoma (SPIRE)

Simon J Crabb et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: Preclinical data indicate that DNA methyltransferase inhibition will circumvent cisplatin resistance in various cancers.

Patient and methods: SPIRE comprised a dose-escalation phase for incurable metastatic solid cancers, followed by a randomized dose expansion phase for neoadjuvant treatment of T2-4a N0 M0 bladder urothelial carcinoma. The primary objective was a recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for guadecitabine combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Treatment comprised 21-day gemcitabine and cisplatin cycles (cisplatin 70 mg/m2, i.v., day 8 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2, i.v., days 8 + 15). Guadecitabine was injected subcutaneously on days 1-5, within escalation phase cohorts, and to half of 20 patients in the expansion phase. Registration ID: ISRCTN 16332228.

Results: Within the escalation phase, dose-limiting toxicities related predominantly to myelosuppression requiring G-CSF prophylaxis from cohort 2 (guadecitabine 20 mg/m2, days 1-5). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events in 17 patients in the dose-escalation phase were neutropenia (76.5%), thrombocytopenia (64.7%), leukopenia (29.4%), and anemia (29.4%). Addition of guadecitabine to gemcitabine and cisplatin in the expansion phase resulted in similar rates of severe hematologic adverse events, similar cisplatin dose intensity, but modestly reduced gemcitabine dose intensity. Radical treatment options after chemotherapy were not compromised. Pharmacodynamics evaluations indicated guadecitabine maximal target effect at the point of cisplatin administration. Pharmacokinetics were consistent with prior data. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusions: The guadecitabine RP2D was 20 mg/m2, days 1-5, in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin and required GCSF prophylaxis. Gene promoter methylation pharmacodynamics are optimal with this schedule. Addition of guadecitabine to gemcitabine and cisplatin was tolerable, despite some additional myelosuppression, and warrants further investigation to assess efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest:

SJC reports consulting or advisory roles for Roche, Janssen Cilag, MSD, Astellas, Bayer and AstraZeneca, and research funding provision from Astex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZenaca and Clovis Oncology. SD reports consultancy or advisory roles for GSK, Incanthera and Boehringer Ingelheim, and research funding from Amgen. JWFC has received reimbursement for consultancy from Astra Zeneca, Roche and Janssen, speaker fees from BMS, MSD, Nucleix and Roche, and honoraria for membership of an advisory board for Ferring. NS has received speaker fees from Pfizer, EUSA Pharma and BMS. DE has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Janssen and MSD. RAH has received honoraria related membership from advisory boards from MSD, Roche, Nektar pharmaceuticals, Janssen, BMS Bayer and Astellas and speakers fees from Roche and Janssen. DC is employed by Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Swimmers plots representing time on treatment and dose alterations within (A) the dose escalation phase and (B) the dose expansion phase. Within the expansion phase, P4 indicates patients were planned for 4 cycles of chemotherapy, with other patients planned for 3 cycles. Note: one patient within the GC only control arm discontinued trial treatment, per protocol, due to emergent renal impairment but completed 3 further cycles of GC chemotherapy prior to cystectomy
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pharmacodynamic data for guadecitabine effect with respect to (A, B) dose level cohort within the dose expansion phase and (C, D) randomised treatment allocation within the dose expansion phase for (A, C) mean cfDNA LINE-1 promotor methylation with respect to dose level cohort or treatment arm respectively and (B, D) HbF re-expression status for individual patients and line of best fit (dashed lines, Loess method)

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. - PubMed
    1. Birtle A, Johnson M, Chester J, Jones R, Dolling D, Bryan RT, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (the POUT trial): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10232):1268–77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. International collaboration of trialists on behalf of the Medical Research Council Advanced Bladder Cancer Working Party, EORTC Genito-Urinary Group ABCSG, Group NCIoCCT, Finnbladder NBCSG, group CUEdTOC. Neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. International collaboration of trialists. Lancet. 1999;354(9178):533–40. - PubMed
    1. von der Maase H, Hansen SW, Roberts JT, Dogliotti L, Oliver T, Moore MJ, et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(17):3068–77. - PubMed
    1. Crabb SJ, Douglas J. The latest treatment options for bladder cancer. Br Med Bull. 2018;128(1):85–95. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms