Does Language Matter? Identity-First Versus Person-First Language Use in Autism Research: A Response to Vivanti
- PMID: 33474662
- PMCID: PMC7817071
- DOI: 10.1007/s10803-020-04858-w
Does Language Matter? Identity-First Versus Person-First Language Use in Autism Research: A Response to Vivanti
Abstract
In response to Vivanti's 'Ask The Editor…' paper [Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(2), 691-693], we argue that the use of language in autism research has material consequences for autistic people including stigmatisation, dehumanisation, and violence. Further, that the debate in the use of person-first language versus identity-first language should centre first and foremost on the needs, autonomy, and rights of autistic people, so in to preserve their rights to self-determination. Lastly, we provide directions for future research.
Keywords: Autism; Identity-first language; Person-first language; Rights-based approach; Stigma.
© 2021. The Author(s).
References
-
- Alajos Kiss v Hungary App no 38832/0. (ECtHR, 20 May 2010).
-
- Arnardóttir OM. Vulnerability under article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oslo Law Review. 2017;1(3):150–171. doi: 10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2017-03-03. - DOI
-
- Arnold, L. (2017). A brief history of “Neurodiversity” as a concept and perhaps a movement. Autonomy, the Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies, 1(5). The Fifth Edition of Autonomy. Retrieved from http://www.larryarnold.net/Autonomy/index.php/autonomy/article/view/AR23
-
- ASAN Autism Self Advocacy Network. (2020). Anti-fillicide toolkit. Retrieved from https://autisticadvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/ASAN-Anti-Filici...
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
