Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;48(2):1233-1241.
doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06135-0. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

Influence of microcurrent on the modulation of remodelling genes in a wound healing assay

Affiliations

Influence of microcurrent on the modulation of remodelling genes in a wound healing assay

Daniela Fernanda Dezotti Silva et al. Mol Biol Rep. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

The literature has shown the beneficial effects of microcurrent (MC) therapy on tissue repair. We investigated if the application of MC at 10 μA/90 s could modulate the expression of remodeling genes transforming growth factor beta (Tgfb), connective tissue growth factor (Ctgf), insulin-like growth factor 1 (Igf1), tenascin C (Tnc), Fibronectin (Fn1), Scleraxis (Scx), Fibromodulin (Fmod) and tenomodulin in NIH/3T3 fibroblasts in a wound healing assay. The cell migration was analyzed between days 0 and 4 in both fibroblasts (F) and fibroblasts + MC (F+MC) groups. On the 4th day, cell viability and gene expression were also analyzed after daily MC application. Higher expression of Ctgf and lower expression of Tnc and Fmod, respectively, were observed in the F+MC group in relation to F group (p < 0.05), and no difference was observed between the groups for the genes Tgfb, Fn1 and Scx. In cell migration, a higher number of cells in the scratch region was observed in group F+MC (p < 0.05) compared to group F on the 4th day, and the cell viability assay showed no difference between the groups. In conclusion, MC therapy at an intensity/time of 10 μA/90 s with 4 daily applications did not affect cell viability, stimulated fibroblasts migration with the involvement of Ctgf, and reduced the Tnc and Fmod expression.

Keywords: Cell migration; Fibroblasts; Genes; Microcurrent; Therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yu C, Hu ZQ, Peng RY (2014) Effects and mechanisms of a microcurrent dressing on skin wound healing: a review. Mil Med Res 1:24 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Tai G, Tai M, Zhao M (2018) Electrically stimulated cell migration and its contribution to wound healing. Burns Trauma 6:20 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Hunckler J, de Mel A (2017) A current affair: electrotherapy in wound healing. J Multidiscip Healthc 10:179–194 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Uemura M, Maeshige N, Koga Y, Ishikawa-Aoyama M, Miyoshi M, Sugimoto M, Terashi H, Usami M (2016) Monophasic pulsed 200-μA current promotes galvanotaxis with polarization of actin filament and integrin α2β1 in human dermal fibroblasts. Eplasty 16:e6 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Sugimoto M, Maeshige N, Honda H, Yoshikawa Y, Uemura M, Yamamoto M, Terashi H (2012) Optimum microcurrent stimulation intensity for galvanotaxis in human fibroblasts. J Wound Care 21:5–6, 8,10; discussion 10–11 - PubMed - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources