Comparison of treatments for the prevention of fetal growth restriction in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- PMID: 33475972
- PMCID: PMC8310508
- DOI: 10.1007/s11739-020-02609-4
Comparison of treatments for the prevention of fetal growth restriction in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Abstract
Women with criteria and non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) carry an increased risk of pregnancy complications, including fetal growth restriction (FGR). The management of obstetric APS traditionally involves clinicians, obstetricians and gynaecologists; however, the most appropriate prophylactic treatment strategy for FGR prevention in APS is still debated. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NetMA) to summarize current evidence on pharmacological treatments for the prevention of FGR in APS. We searched PubMed and Embase from inception until July 2020, for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies on pregnant women with criteria or non-criteria obstetric APS. NetMA using a frequentist framework were conducted for the primary outcome (FGR) and for secondary outcomes (fetal or neonatal death and preterm birth). Adverse events were narratively summarised. Out of 1124 citations, we included eight studies on 395 pregnant patients with obstetric APS treated with low-dose aspirin (LDA) + unfractionated heparin (UFH) (n = 132 patients), LDA (n = 115), LDA + low molecular weight heparin (n = 100), LDA + corticosteroids (n = 29), LDA + UFH + intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 7), or untreated (n = 12). No difference among treatments emerged in terms of FGR prevention, but estimates were largely imprecise, and most studies were at high/unclear risk of bias. An increased risk of fetal or neonatal death was found for LDA monotherapy as compared to LDA + heparin, and for no treatment as compared to LDA + corticosteroids. The risk of preterm birth was higher for LDA + UFH + IVIg as compared to LDA or LDA + heparin, and for LDA + corticosteroids as compared to LDA or LDA + LMWH. No treatment was associated with an increased risk of bleeding, thrombocytopenia or osteopenia.
Keywords: Antiphospholipid syndrome; Aspirin; Fetal growth restriction; Heparin; Network meta-analysis.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: a comprehensive literature review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 24;25(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07471-w. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 40128683 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pharmacological Interventions for the Prevention of Fetal Growth Restriction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jul;110(1):189-199. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2164. Epub 2021 Feb 26. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021. PMID: 33423282
-
Heparin for preventing adverse obstetrical outcomes in pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome, a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Feb;50(2):101974. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101974. Epub 2020 Nov 7. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021. PMID: 33171281
-
Prevention of recurrent miscarriage in women with antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Lupus. 2021 Jan;30(1):70-79. doi: 10.1177/0961203320967097. Epub 2020 Oct 20. Lupus. 2021. PMID: 33081590
-
Comparison of therapeutic interventions for recurrent pregnancy loss in association with antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Am J Reprod Immunol. 2020 Apr;83(4):e13219. doi: 10.1111/aji.13219. Epub 2020 Jan 28. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2020. PMID: 31872490
Cited by
-
Antiphospholipid Antibodies Increase the Risk of Fetal Growth Restriction: A Systematic Meta-Analysis.Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Jan 31;2022:4308470. doi: 10.1155/2022/4308470. eCollection 2022. Int J Clin Pract. 2022. PMID: 35685559 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Low-molecular-weight heparin and preeclampsia - does the sword cut both ways? Three case reports and review of literature.World J Clin Cases. 2024 Mar 26;12(9):1634-1643. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i9.1634. World J Clin Cases. 2024. PMID: 38576748 Free PMC article.
-
Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: a comprehensive literature review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 24;25(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07471-w. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 40128683 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding the Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia: Exploring the Role of Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Future Directions.J Clin Med. 2024 May 2;13(9):2668. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092668. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38731197 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Beltagy A, Trespidi L, Gerosa M, et al (2020) Anti-phospholipid antibodies and reproductive failures. Am J Reprod Immunol e13258. doi: 10.1111/aji.13258 - PubMed
-
- Alijotas-Reig J, Esteve-Valverde E, Ferrer-Oliveras R, et al. Comparative study of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) and non-criteria obstetric APS (NC-OAPS): report of 1640 cases from the EUROAPS registry. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020;59:1306–1314. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez419. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous