Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution for bowel preparation in Japanese patients undergoing colonoscopy: Noninferiority-based, randomized, controlled study
- PMID: 33476415
- PMCID: PMC8596579
- DOI: 10.1111/den.13930
Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution for bowel preparation in Japanese patients undergoing colonoscopy: Noninferiority-based, randomized, controlled study
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution administered using the same-day dose and the split-dose regimens with those of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate solution, used for bowel preparation in Japanese patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Methods: This multicenter (n = 13), randomized, active-controlled, colonoscopist- and image evaluator-blinded, noninferiority study with parallel-group comparison recruited 632 patients from December 2018 to June 2019. Of these, 602 patients were divided into the oral sulfate solution same-day dose group (n = 200); oral sulfate solution split-dose group (n = 202); and polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate same-day dose group (n = 200). Differences in the efficacy rates between the polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate group and each oral sulfate solution group were calculated using the asymptotic method. The safety of the oral sulfate solution was evaluated, based on the occurrence of adverse events and reactions.
Results: Both oral sulfate solution protocols were confirmed as noninferior to the polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate protocol for bowel-cleansing. The occurrence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the oral sulfate solution same-day dose group than in the polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate group (P = 0.010). The occurrence of adverse reactions was not significantly different between the oral sulfate solution split-dose and the polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate group.
Conclusions: Oral sulfate solution is not only safe and efficacious but also not inferior to polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate solution (active control). It could be used for bowel preparation in Japanese patients scheduled for colonoscopy (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03794310).
Keywords: colonoscopy; human; oral sulfate solution; polyethylene glycol; sulfate.
© 2021 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. contracted and paid all hospitals on the basis of good clinical practice. Author H. Tajiri has received consulting fees from Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Author S. Ichinose is an employee of Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The work was supported by Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Figures

Similar articles
-
A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution plus polyethylene glycol as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep;80(3):482-91. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.043. Epub 2014 May 13. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014. PMID: 24830577 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid and an Oral Sulfate Solution in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation: A Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Clinical Trial.Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Apr;60(4):426-432. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000759. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017. PMID: 28267011 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of split-dose bowel preparation with 1 L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate compared with 2 L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate in a Korean population: a phase IV, multicenter, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study.Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Mar;95(3):500-511.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.041. Epub 2021 Oct 12. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022. PMID: 34653425 Clinical Trial.
-
Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Dig Endosc. 2022 Sep;34(6):1121-1133. doi: 10.1111/den.14299. Epub 2022 Apr 6. Dig Endosc. 2022. PMID: 35294782 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Single versus split dose polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation in children undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Sep;9(5):3028-3037. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-582. Epub 2020 Sep 2. Ann Palliat Med. 2020. PMID: 32921076
Cited by
-
Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.DEN Open. 2025 Apr 16;5(1):e70113. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70113. eCollection 2025 Apr. DEN Open. 2025. PMID: 40248440 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Efficacy of 480 ml Oral Sodium Sulfate for Improving Insufficient Bowel Preparation of Colonoscopy with High-Concentrated Polyethylene Glycol.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2023 Sep 30;2023:6359165. doi: 10.1155/2023/6359165. eCollection 2023. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2023. PMID: 37808965 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy comparison of polyethylene glycol, hemp seed oil, and 5% sugar brine for bowel preparation in older patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2023 Mar 6;24(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07059-1. Trials. 2023. PMID: 36879331 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of linaclotide in combination with polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation in Chinese patients undergoing colonoscopy polypectomy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 23;14(7):e080723. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080723. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39043596 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of parameters influencing the quality of colon preparation with a split-dose regimen of sulfate salts.Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):172-178. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0868. Epub 2024 Feb 19. Ann Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 38481779 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers J‐J, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 378–84. - PubMed
-
- Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 894–909. - PubMed
-
- Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y et al. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 2020; 32: 219–39. - PubMed
-
- Ell C, Fischbach W, Keller R et al. A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel‐cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG‐01*). Endoscopy 2003; 35: 300–4. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical