Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group
- PMID: 33476768
- PMCID: PMC8352629
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001
Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group
Abstract
Background and objective: This article explores the need for conceptual advances and practical guidance in the application of the GRADE approach within public health contexts.
Methods: We convened an expert workshop and conducted a scoping review to identify challenges experienced by GRADE users in public health contexts. We developed this concept article through thematic analysis and an iterative process of consultation and discussion conducted with members electronically and at three GRADE Working Group meetings.
Results: Five priority issues can pose challenges for public health guideline developers and systematic reviewers when applying GRADE: (1) incorporating the perspectives of diverse stakeholders; (2) selecting and prioritizing health and "nonhealth" outcomes; (3) interpreting outcomes and identifying a threshold for decision-making; (4) assessing certainty of evidence from diverse sources, including nonrandomized studies; and (5) addressing implications for decision makers, including concerns about conditional recommendations. We illustrate these challenges with examples from public health guidelines and systematic reviews, identifying gaps where conceptual advances may facilitate the consistent application or further development of the methodology and provide solutions.
Conclusion: The GRADE Public Health Group will respond to these challenges with solutions that are coherent with existing guidance and can be consistently implemented across public health decision-making contexts.
Keywords: GRADE; Guidelines; Health policy; Nonrandomized studies; Public health; Social determinants.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making.J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:138-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Sep 24. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021. PMID: 32980429 Free PMC article.
-
The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions.Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 May 29;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0320-2. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018. PMID: 29843743 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: a study protocol.Implement Sci. 2011 May 10;6:46. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-46. Implement Sci. 2011. PMID: 21569255 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and Severity of Lower Gastrointestinal Symptoms amongst Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 28;11(21):6363. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216363. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36362591 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Strengthening implementation guidelines for HIV service delivery: Considerations for future evidence generation and synthesis.PLoS Med. 2023 Mar 6;20(3):e1004168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004168. eCollection 2023 Mar. PLoS Med. 2023. PMID: 36877738 Free PMC article.
-
Suicide among transport industry workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Nov 1;48(8):598-610. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4059. Epub 2022 Sep 25. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022. PMID: 36153776 Free PMC article.
-
Grading nutrition evidence: where to go from here?Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):1385-1387. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab124. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021. PMID: 33963733 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Systems for rating bodies of evidence used in systematic reviews of air pollution exposure and reproductive and children's health: a methodological survey.Environ Health. 2024 Mar 28;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12940-024-01069-z. Environ Health. 2024. PMID: 38539160 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Alonso-Coello P., Schünemann H.J., Moberg J., Brignardello-Petersen R., Akl E.A., Davoli M. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction. BMJ. 2016:353. - PubMed
-
- Schünemann H.J., Mustafa R., Brozek J., Santesso N., Alonso-Coello P., Guyatt G. GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;76:89–98. - PubMed
-
- Acheson D. The Stationery Office; London: 1988. Public Health in England: The Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Future Development to the Public Health Function.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources