Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul:135:42-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group

Affiliations

Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group

Michele Hilton Boon et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background and objective: This article explores the need for conceptual advances and practical guidance in the application of the GRADE approach within public health contexts.

Methods: We convened an expert workshop and conducted a scoping review to identify challenges experienced by GRADE users in public health contexts. We developed this concept article through thematic analysis and an iterative process of consultation and discussion conducted with members electronically and at three GRADE Working Group meetings.

Results: Five priority issues can pose challenges for public health guideline developers and systematic reviewers when applying GRADE: (1) incorporating the perspectives of diverse stakeholders; (2) selecting and prioritizing health and "nonhealth" outcomes; (3) interpreting outcomes and identifying a threshold for decision-making; (4) assessing certainty of evidence from diverse sources, including nonrandomized studies; and (5) addressing implications for decision makers, including concerns about conditional recommendations. We illustrate these challenges with examples from public health guidelines and systematic reviews, identifying gaps where conceptual advances may facilitate the consistent application or further development of the methodology and provide solutions.

Conclusion: The GRADE Public Health Group will respond to these challenges with solutions that are coherent with existing guidance and can be consistently implemented across public health decision-making contexts.

Keywords: GRADE; Guidelines; Health policy; Nonrandomized studies; Public health; Social determinants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Process of developing the scope and priorities of the GRADE Public Health Group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alonso-Coello P., Schünemann H.J., Moberg J., Brignardello-Petersen R., Akl E.A., Davoli M. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction. BMJ. 2016:353. - PubMed
    1. Moberg J., Oxman A.D., Rosenbaum S., Schünemann H.J., Guyatt G., Flottorp S. The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schünemann H.J., Mustafa R., Brozek J., Santesso N., Alonso-Coello P., Guyatt G. GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;76:89–98. - PubMed
    1. Acheson D. The Stationery Office; London: 1988. Public Health in England: The Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Future Development to the Public Health Function.
    1. Griffiths S., Jewell T., Donnelly P. Public health in practice: the three domains of public health. Public Health. 2005;119(10):907–913. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources