Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 18;11(1):226.
doi: 10.3390/ani11010226.

Abattoir-Based Measures to Assess Swine Welfare: Analysis of the Methods Adopted in European Slaughterhouses

Silvio De Luca  1 , Emanuela Zanardi  1 , Giovanni Loris Alborali  2 , Adriana Ianieri  1 , Sergio Ghidini  1
Affiliations
Review

Abattoir-Based Measures to Assess Swine Welfare: Analysis of the Methods Adopted in European Slaughterhouses

Silvio De Luca et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

The assessment of swine welfare requires feasible, reliable, and reasonable indicators. On-farm evaluation of pig welfare can provide valuable information to veterinarians and farmers. However, such protocols can result expensive and time-consuming. With this regard, an interest in the appraisal of swine welfare at abattoir has grown over the recent years. In particular, the use of certain lesions collected directly from slaughtered animals to determine the welfare status of pigs has been evaluated by several authors. In the present review, the different methods developed to score lesions collected directly from the body and the viscera of animals slaughtered in European abattoirs ("abattoir-based measures") are presented. The text specifically focuses on the methods currently available in the literature for the scoring of body, pluck and gastric lesions during post-mortem activities. Moreover, the strengths and weaknesses of abattoir-based measures schemes are discussed. To conclude, the future perspectives of the assessment of pig welfare at the slaughterhouse are described, appealing for a benchmarking system that can be systematically used by veterinarians and other professional figures involved in the process.

Keywords: abattoir; animal-based measures; scoring schemes; welfare indicators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Alonso M.E., González-Montaña J.R., Lomillos J.M. Consumers’ Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare. Animals. 2020;10:385. doi: 10.3390/ani10030385. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Devitt C., Boyle L., Teixeira D.L., O’Connell N.E., Hawe M., Hanlon A. Stakeholder Perspectives on the Use of Pig Meat Inspection as a Health and Welfare Diagnostic Tool in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland; a SWOT Analysis. Ir. Vet. J. 2016;69:17. doi: 10.1186/s13620-016-0076-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heerwagen L.R., Mørkbak M.R., Denver S., Sandøe P., Christensen T. The Role of Quality Labels in Market-Driven Animal Welfare. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 2015;28:67–84. doi: 10.1007/s10806-014-9521-z. - DOI
    1. Thorslund C.A.H., Aaslyng M.D., Lassen J. Perceived Importance and Responsibility for Market-Driven Pig Welfare: Literature Review. Meat Sci. 2017;125:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.11.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 Regulation (EU) No 1099/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2009. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2009;303/1:1–30.