Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Jan 19;18(2):804.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020804.

Nursing Students' Satisfaction: A Comparison between Medium- and High-Fidelity Simulation Training

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Nursing Students' Satisfaction: A Comparison between Medium- and High-Fidelity Simulation Training

Ana Rosa Alconero-Camarero et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Training based on clinical simulation is an effective method of teaching in nursing. Nevertheless, there is no clear evidence about if it is better to use high- or medium-fidelity simulation. The aim is to analyse if students are more satisfied when their clinical simulation practices are based on high-fidelity simulation (HFS) or medium-fidelity simulation (MFS). Students´ satisfaction was assessed using the Satisfaction Scale Questionnaire with High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation. The sample is composed of 393 students from two Spanish Universities. Satisfaction with simulation in nursing students is significantly greater in MFS than HFS. Simulation is beneficial for learning in all its forms, but for the acquisition of basic skills, and at a lower cost, MFS proves to be effective. However, high-fidelity is not always better than medium-fidelity as this depends on the student's level of knowledge and clinical experience.

Keywords: high-fidelity simulation training; nursing students; personal satisfaction; simulation training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. National Agency for the Evaluation of Quality and Accreditation Support Guide for the Writing, Implementation and Evaluation of Learning Outcomes Version 1.0. [(accessed on 24 November 2020)]; Available online: http://www.aneca.es/Sala-de-prensa/Noticias/2013/ANECA-presenta-la-Guia-....
    1. ORDEN CIN/2134/2008, 3 July. Ministry of Science and Innovation. Spain. [(accessed on 13 December 2020)]; Available online: https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2008-12388.
    1. Kajander-Unkuri S., Meretoja R., Katajisto J., Saarikoski M., Salminen L., Suhonen R., Leino-Kilpi H. Self-assessed level of competence of graduating nursing students and factors related to it. Nurse Educ. Today. 2014;34:795–801. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.08.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stevanin S., Bressan V., Bulfone G., Zanini A., Dante A., Palese A. Knowledge and competence with patient safety as perceived by nursing students: The findings of a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ. Today. 2015;35:926–934. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.04.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deschênes M.F., Goudreau J., Fernandez N. Learning strategies used by undergraduate nursing students in the context of a digitial educational strategy based on script concordance: A descriptive study. Nurse Educ. Today. 2020;95:104607. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104607. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources