Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 19;18(2):807.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020807.

Process Simulation and Environmental Aspects of Dimethyl Ether Production from Digestate-Derived Syngas

Affiliations

Process Simulation and Environmental Aspects of Dimethyl Ether Production from Digestate-Derived Syngas

Aristide Giuliano et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The production of dimethyl ether from renewables or waste is a promising strategy to push towards a sustainable energy transition of alternative eco-friendly diesel fuel. In this work, we simulate the synthesis of dimethyl ether from a syngas (a mixture of CO, CO2 and H2) produced from gasification of digestate. In particular, a thermodynamic analysis was performed to individuate the best process conditions and syngas conditioning processes to maximize yield to dimethyl etehr (DME). Process simulation was carried out by ChemCAD software, and it was particularly focused on the effect of process conditions of both water gas shift and CO2 absorption by Selexol® on the syngas composition, with a direct influence on DME productivity. The final best flowsheet and the best process conditions were evaluated in terms of CO2 equivalent emissions. Results show direct DME synthesis global yield was higher without the WGS section and with a carbon capture equal to 85%. The final environmental impact was found equal to -113 kgCO2/GJ, demonstrating that DME synthesis from digestate may be considered as a suitable strategy for carbon dioxide recycling.

Keywords: carbon footprint; digestate; dimethyl ether; gasification; process simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Procedure scheme to obtain the optimal bio-DME environmental assessment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Block flow diagram of the production of DME by gasification of digestate and direct synthesis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Thermodynamic analysis scheme.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Theoretical equilibrium DME yield as a function of reaction temperature and pressure, for the raw syngas with the following molar composition: H2/CO = 0.87, CO2/CO = 0.94. Lines are only a guide for the reader.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Theoretical equilibrium DME yield as a function of the initial CO2/CO molar ratio, reaction temperature and pressure, for syngas with H2/CO = 0.87. Lines are only a guide for the reader.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Theoretical equilibrium DME yield as a function of the initial CO2/CO molar ratio, reaction temperature and pressure, for syngas with H2/CO = 2. Lines are only a guide for the reader.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Theoretical equilibrium DME yield derivative with respect to CO2/CO molar ratio as a function of the initial CO2/CO molar ratio, reaction temperature and pressure, for syngas with H2/CO = 0.87. Lines are only a guide for the reader.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Theoretical equilibrium DME yield derivative with respect to CO2/CO molar ratio as a function of the initial CO2/CO molar ratio, reaction temperature and pressure, for syngas with H2/CO = 2. Lines are only a guide for the reader.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Theoretical equilibrium DME yield (global or single-pass) with respect to the CO2 capture, fixing the WGS conversion and the purge ratio to 0% and 10%, respectively.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Theoretical equilibrium DME yield (global or single pass) with respect to the WGS conversion, fixing CO2 capture and the purge ratio to 85% and 10%, respectively.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Theoretical equilibrium DME yield (global or single pass) with respect to the purge ratio, fixing WGS conversion and the CO2 capture to 0% and to 85%, respectively.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Flowsheet diagram for the optimal process result.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Equivalent CO2 emissions of the optimal flowsheet.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Environmental impact comparison between bio-DME from digestate with CCS, bio-DME from digestate without CCS, DME from biomass indirect liquefaction [56] and diesel.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Effect of initial digestate moisture content on carbon dioxide emission of the proposed process plant for DME synthesis.

References

    1. Wang L., Vo X.V., Shahbaz M., Ak A. Globalization and carbon emissions: Is there any role of agriculture value-added, financial development, and natural resource rent in the aftermath of COP21? J. Environ. Manag. 2020;268:110712. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110712. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quadrelli E.A., Centi G., Duplan J.L., Perathoner S. Carbon dioxide recycling: Emerging large-scale technologies with industrial potential. ChemSusChem. 2011;4:1194–1215. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201100473. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Demirbas A. Waste management, waste resource facilities and waste conversion processes. Energy Convers. Manag. 2011;52:1280–1287. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.025. - DOI
    1. Hoornweg D., Bhada-Tata P. What a Waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management. [(accessed on 5 November 2020)]; Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17388.
    1. Migliori M., Catizzone E., Giordano G., Le Pera A., Sellaro M., Lista A., Zanardi G., Zoia L. Pilot Plant Data Assessment in Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Fraction of Municipal Waste Solids. Processes. 2019;7:54. doi: 10.3390/pr7010054. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources