Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 21;19(1):20.
doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02130-8.

Clinicopathological features and risk factors analysis of lymph node metastasis and long-term prognosis in patients with synchronous multiple gastric cancer

Affiliations

Clinicopathological features and risk factors analysis of lymph node metastasis and long-term prognosis in patients with synchronous multiple gastric cancer

Liang Chen et al. World J Surg Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: As a common malignancy, gastric cancer (GC) remains an important threat to human's health. The incidence of synchronous multiple gastric cancer (SMGC) has increased obviously with technical advances of endoscopic and pathological examinations. Several studies have investigated the relationship between SMGC and solitary gastric cancer (SGC). However, little is known about the relationship between early and advanced SMGCs, and the independent risk factors of lymph node metastasis and prognosis in SMGC patients remain unclear.

Methods: We retrospectively collected 57 patients diagnosed as SMGC and underwent radical gastrectomies from December 2011 to September 2019. Epidemiological data and clinicopathological characteristics of all patients were recorded. Postoperative follow-up was performed by telephone or outpatient service. Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was adopted in analysis of categorical data. Continuous data were analyzed by using unpaired t test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the independent risk factors of lymph node metastasis and tumor recurrence of SMGC.

Results: There were 45 males and 12 females. The average age was 62.1 years old. There were 20 patients with early SMGC and 37 patients with advanced SMGC. Most of patients (91.2%) had two malignant lesions. Tumor recurrence occurred in 8 patients, among which 7 patients died from recurrence. The rates of total gastrectomy, tumor size ≥ 2 cm, poorly differentiated type, lymph node metastasis, ulcer and nerve invasion, and preoperative CEA level were significantly higher in advanced SMGC patients compared to those with early SMGC. Lymphovascular cancer plug and preoperative CA125 were the independent risk factors of lymph node metastasis in patients with SMGC. Lymph node metastasis, nerve invasion, and preoperative AFP might be the risk factors of tumor recurrence of SMGC, but need further validation.

Conclusions: In patients with SMGC, the presence of tumor size ≥ 2 cm, poorly differentiated type, lymph node metastasis, ulcer, nerve invasion, and relatively high preoperative CEA level might indicate the advanced SMGC. More attention should be paid to lymph node metastasis in SMGC patients with lymphovascular cancer plug and high preoperative CA125. Lymph node metastasis, nerve invasion, and preoperative AFP might be associated with recurrence of SMGC, needing further validation.

Keywords: Lymph node metastasis; Prognosis; Risk factors; Synchronous multiple gastric cancer; Tumor recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The RFS and OS curves of the early and advanced SMGC patients. a RFS of early SMGC. b OS of early SMGC. c RFS of advanced SMGC. d OS of advanced SMGC
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The preoperative CEA level in early SMGC patients was remarkably lower than that of patients with advanced SMGC (P = 0.0384)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The preoperative CA125 level in patients with LNM was significantly higher than that of patients without LNM (P = 0.001)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Log-rank test indicated that the difference of RFS was statistically significant between the patients with and without LNM (P = 0.0498)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
    1. Zhao B, Mei D, Luo R, Lu H, Bao S, Xu H, et al. Clinicopathological features, risk of LNM and survival outcome of synchronous multiple early gastric cancer. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2020;44:939–946. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.02.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Isobe T, Hashimoto K, Kizaki J, Murakami N, Aoyagi K, Koufuji K, et al. Characteristics and prognosis of synchronous multiple early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(41):7154–7159. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7154. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee BE. Characteristics of missed synchronous gastric epithelial neoplasms. Clin Endosc. 2017;50(3):211–212. doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.058. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nitta T, Egashira Y, Akutagawa H, Edagawa G, Kurisu Y, Nomura E, et al. Study of clinicopathological factors associated with the occurrence of synchronous multiple gastric carcinomas. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12(1):23–30. doi: 10.1007/s10120-008-0493-4. - DOI - PubMed