Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 26;77(3):300-313.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.030.

Machine Learning and the Future of Cardiovascular Care: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Affiliations
Review

Machine Learning and the Future of Cardiovascular Care: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Giorgio Quer et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .

Abstract

The role of physicians has always been to synthesize the data available to them to identify diagnostic patterns that guide treatment and follow response. Today, increasingly sophisticated machine learning algorithms may grow to support clinical experts in some of these tasks. Machine learning has the potential to benefit patients and cardiologists, but only if clinicians take an active role in bringing these new algorithms into practice. The aim of this review is to introduce clinicians who are not data science experts to key concepts in machine learning that will allow them to better understand the field and evaluate new literature and developments. The current published data in machine learning for cardiovascular disease is then summarized, using both a bibliometric survey, with code publicly available to enable similar analysis for any research topic of interest, and select case studies. Finally, several ways that clinicians can and must be involved in this emerging field are presented.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; bibliometric analysis; cardiology; deep learning; literature search; machine learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author Disclosures Resources at Scripps Research (to Dr. Quer) were provided by the National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002550 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NCATS) and in part by the National Science Foundation Convergence Accelerator (OIA-2040727). Drs. Ramy and Rima Arnaout were supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01HL15039401), Department of Defense (W81XWH-19-1-0294), and the American Heart Association (17IGMV33870001). Dr. Rima Arnaout is additionally supported by the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub. Mr. Henne has reported that he has no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Marked growth in cardiac AI/ML studies.
The plots in the first row show numbers of publications per year; red denotes original research, while pink denotes non-original articles such as reviews and commentary. The second row shows the total number of papers (any topic) added to each of the three collections, while the third row presents the percentage of papers on cardiac AI/ML. The insets for Pubmed in the first two rows show the cumulative number of papers across all previous years, while in the third row it shows the cumulative percentages considering all papers till that year. *2020 numbers are partial.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Content in cardiac AI/ML publications on PubMed.
(a) Distribution of publications by disease category. (b) Distribution of publications by data modality. (c) Number of papers studying various cardiac disease categories by data type (waveform data includes catheterization, arterial pulse waveforms, plethysmography, and other waveform data but does not include ECG; atherosclerosis includes dyslipidemia, peripheral vascular disease and cerebrovascular disease). (d) Distribution of publications by goal. (e) Distribution of publications by machine learning method.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. An international and collaborative effort.
(a) Total publications on cardiac AI/ML in PubMed, worldwide and in the United States (note log scale). (b) Publications per capita worldwide and in the United States (note log scale). (c) Collaborations measured by author locations on each publication, presented worldwide and statewide (for clarity, only top ten countries and/or states are labeled).
Central Illustration.
Central Illustration.. Marked growth in cardiac AI/ML studies span several disease focus areas and several data types.
Publications on machine learning in cardiology continue to grow (inset shows cumulative number of cardiac AI/ML papers). Several disease categories and data modalities have been studied in these publications, but several areas remain open for further exploration. Asterisk indicates partial information for the year 2020.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shameer K, Johnson KW, Glicksberg BS, Dudley JT, Sengupta PP. Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: are we there yet? Heart 2018;104:1156–1164. - PubMed
    1. Harnessing the Power of Data in Health: Stanford Medicine 2017 Health Trends Report. June 2017. https://med.stanford.edu/content/dam/sm/sm-news/documents/StanfordMedici... Accessed March 20 2020.
    1. Obermeyer Z, Lee TH. Lost in Thought - The Limits of the Human Mind and the Future of Medicine. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1209–1211. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Litjens G, Ciompi F, Wolterink JM et al. State-of-the-Art Deep Learning in Cardiovascular Image Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:1549–1565. - PubMed
    1. Sardar P, Abbott JD, Kundu A, Aronow HD, Granada JF, Giri J. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Interventional Cardiology: From Decision-Making Aid to Advanced Interventional Procedure Assistance. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019;12:1293–1303. - PubMed

Publication types