Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2861-e2866.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1706.

Antigen-Based Testing but Not Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Correlates With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Viral Culture

Affiliations

Antigen-Based Testing but Not Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Correlates With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Viral Culture

Andrew Pekosz et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Individuals can test positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by molecular assays following the resolution of their clinical disease. Recent studies indicate that SARS-CoV-2 antigen-based tests are likely to be positive early in the disease course, when there is an increased likelihood of high levels of infectious virus.

Methods: Upper respiratory specimens from 251 participants with coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms (≤7 days from symptom onset) were prospectively collected and tested with a lateral flow antigen test and a real-time polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR) assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Specimens from a subset of the study specimens were utilized to determine the presence of infectious virus in the VeroE6TMPRSS2 cell culture model.

Results: The antigen test demonstrated a higher positive predictive value (90%) than rt-PCR (70%) when compared to culture-positive results. The positive percentage agreement for detection of infectious virus for the antigen test was similar to rt-PCR when compared to culture results.

Conclusions: The correlation between SARS-CoV-2 antigen and SARS-CoV-2 culture positivity represents a significant advancement in determining the risk for potential transmissibility beyond that which can be achieved by detection of SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA. SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing can facilitate low-cost, scalable, and rapid time-to-result, while providing good risk determination of those who are likely harboring infectious virus, compared to rt-PCR.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; SARS-CoV-2 live culture; antigen testing; rt-PCR testing; viral load.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A, The 38 real-time polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR) assay–positive specimens are plotted by log10 copies/mL (y-axis) and are stratified by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) live culture results (negative, n = 10; positive, n = 28). The median and interquartile range (IQR) values for the rt-PCR–positive/SARS-CoV-2 TMPRSS2 culture–negative tests were 4.21 and 1.37, respectively; the median and IQR values for the rt-PCR–positive/SARS-CoV-2 TMPRSS2 culture–positive tests were 7.39 and 1.66, respectively. The mean values for the SARS-CoV-2 TMPRSS2 culture–negative and SARS-CoV-2 TMPRSS2 assay–positive specimen groups were significantly different (4.01 vs 7.16, respectively; P < .001 based on 2-sample t test [2-tailed]). Antigen test–positive results are indicated as red data points (n = 29), and the antigen test–negative results (n = 9) are indicated by the green data points. B, Probit models linking viral load to the probability of positive result of rt-PCR (Lyra), antigen test (Veritor), SARS-CoV-2 TMPRSS2 culture, and SARS-CoV-2 VeroE6 culture (refer to Huang et al [17]). Viral load levels at which there is a 5% chance of positive result: 1.6, 2.6, 4.5, and 5.75 log10 copies/mL for rt-PCR, antigen, SARS-CoV-2 TMPRSS2 culture, and SARS-CoV-2 VeroE6 culture, respectively.

Comment in

References

    1. Morawska L, Cao J. Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: the world should face the reality. Environ Int 2020; 139:105730. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McAloon C, Collins Á, Hunt K, et al. Incubation period of COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of observational research. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039652. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Griffin JM, Collins AB, Hunt K, et al. A rapid review of available evidence on the serial interval and generation time of COVID-19. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.08.20095075. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. He X, Lau EHY, Wu P, et al. Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19. Nat Med 2020; 26:672–5. - PubMed
    1. Byrne AW, McEvoy D, Collins AB, et al. Inferred duration of infectious period of SARS-CoV-2: rapid scoping review and analysis of available evidence for asymptomatic and symptomatic COVID-19 cases. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039856. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances