Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb 3;22(2):e51644.
doi: 10.15252/embr.202051644. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

Chromatin accessibility dynamics during cell fate reprogramming

Affiliations
Review

Chromatin accessibility dynamics during cell fate reprogramming

Dongwei Li et al. EMBO Rep. .

Abstract

Genome architecture and chromatin dynamics govern the fate and identify of a cell. Recent advances in mapping chromatin landscapes offer valuable tools for the acquisition of accurate information regarding chromatin dynamics. Here we discuss recent findings linking chromatin dynamics to cell fate control. Specifically, chromatin undergoes a binary off/on switch during iPSC reprogramming, closing and opening loci occupied by somatic and pluripotency transcription factors, respectively. This logic of a binary off/on switch may also be operational in cell fate control during normal development and implies that further approaches could potentially be developed to direct cell fate changes both in vitro and in vivo.

Keywords: chromatin dynamics; reprogramming; stem cell.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Hypothetic model of OSK binding to somatic and pluripotent enhancers
Three main approaches for reprogramming are shown on the left. The stages of reprogramming are shown in the middle. Reprogramming kinetics are shown on the right. Upon entry into somatic cells, OSK find ESC‐specific pluripotent enhancers (left arrow “high efficiency path”) or both somatic and pluripotent enhancers (right arrow “low efficiency path”), resulting in differences in reprogramming efficiencies.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Epigenetic modification is coupled with chromatin accessibility dynamics during reprogramming
During reprogramming, silenced ESC‐specific enhancers are activated by two steps, first by demethylation of H3K9me3/H3K27me3/5mC to remove epigenetic barriers; second by opening ESC‐specific enhancers and acetylation of the reprogrammed chromatin to keep it active.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Interfaces between pluripotent and somatic cell states
In each cell type, there are transcription factors, chromatin remodeling factors and epigenetic modifying enzymes that maintain a specific cell identity and resist reprogramming unless a specific group of genes is activated to alter cell fate.
Figure 4
Figure 4. TFs and epigenetic modifiers drive chromatin dynamics
During reprogramming, OSK first bind to closed ES‐specific enhancers and induce chromatin opening (close to open, CO) to activate epigenetic modifiers such as Sap30, which promote the shutdown of the open chromatin (open to close, OC) bound by somatic factors. Thus, CO/OC dynamics control the reprogramming path until full iPSCs formation.

References

    1. Adachi K, Kopp W, Wu G, Heising S, Greber B, Stehling M, Arauzo‐Bravo MJ, Boerno ST, Timmermann B, Vingron M et al (2018) Esrrb unlocks silenced enhancers for reprogramming to naive pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 23: 266–275.e266 - PubMed
    1. Borkent M, Bennett BD, Lackford B, Bar‐Nur O, Brumbaugh J, Wang L, Du Y, Fargo DC, Apostolou E, Cheloufi S et al (2016) A serial shRNA screen for roadblocks to reprogramming identifies the protein modifier SUMO2. Stem Cell Rep 6: 704–716 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyle AP, Davis S, Shulha HP, Meltzer P, Margulies EH, Weng Z, Furey TS, Crawford GE (2008) High‐resolution mapping and characterization of open chromatin across the genome. Cell 132: 311–322 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ (2013) Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA‐binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat Methods 10: 1213–1218 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buenrostro JD, Wu B, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ (2015a) ATAC‐seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome‐wide. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 109: 21–29 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources