Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;17(1):106-112.
doi: 10.3988/jcn.2021.17.1.106.

Validation of a New Screening Tool for Dementia: The Simple Observation Checklist for Activities of Daily Living

Affiliations

Validation of a New Screening Tool for Dementia: The Simple Observation Checklist for Activities of Daily Living

Jinse Park et al. J Clin Neurol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Screening tests for dementia such as the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment are widely used, but there are drawbacks to their efficient use. There remains a need for a brief and easy method of assessing the activities of daily living (ADL) that can be administered to elderly individuals by healthcare workers. We have therefore developed a new scale named the Simple Observation Checklist for Activities of Daily Living (SOC-ADL).

Methods: We developed the SOC-ADL scale as a team of experts engaged in caring for individuals with dementia. This scale comprises eight items and was designed based on the Korean instrumental activities of daily living (K-IADL) scale and the Barthel activities of daily living scale (Barthel Index). The new scale was validated by enrolling 176 patients with cognitive dysfunction across 6 centers. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were performed. We assessed its concurrent validity by performing comparisons with the Korean-MMSE, Clinical Dementia Rating, Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, K-IADL, and Barthel Index, and its criterion validity by performing comparisons between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. We also used Cronbach's alpha to assess the interitem reliability. The appropriate cutoff values were determined by analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves, including the areas underneath them.

Results: EFA extracted one factor and CFA revealed that all of the model fits exceeded the minimum acceptable criteria. The SOC-ADL scores were strongly correlated with those of the other tools for dementia and could be used to differentiate MCI from dementia. Cronbach's alpha values indicated that the results were reliable. The optimal cutoff value of the SOC-ADL for discriminating dementia from MCI was 3 points, which provided a sensitivity and specificity of 74.5% and 75.7%, respectively.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the SOC-ADL is a valid and reliable tool for differentiating dementia from MCI based on an assessment of ADL. This new tool can be used for screening ADL in elderly subjects who have difficulty communicating, and to increase the efficiency of dementia screening at the population level.

Keywords: activities of daily living; dementia; diagnostic screening program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Scree plots in exploratory factor analysis. The number of factors is 1, which have eigenvalues greater than 1.0. A sharp drop in eigenvalues after the first factor was found.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. The ROC curve and AUC of the SOC-ADL and comparison with other scales. AUC of SOC-ADL (A). Comparison of AUC of the SOC-ADL, CDR, CDR-SB and K-IADL (B). ADL: activities of daily living, AUC: area under the curve, CDR: Clinical Dementia Rating, CDR-SB: Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, K-IADL: Korean instrumental activities of daily living, ROC: receiver operating characteristic curve, SOC-ADL: Simple Observation Checklist for Activities of Daily Living.

References

    1. Lee SJ, Seo HJ, Lee DY, Moon SH. Effects of a dementia screening program on healthcare utilization in South Korea: a difference-in-difference analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:3837 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi H, Kim HJ, Kim KH, Oh SI, Kim SH. The Consideration about usefulness of mass screening for dementia. Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2014;13:117–120.
    1. Yang PS, Tang JS, Chen CY. An evaluation study of a dementia screening program in Taiwan: an application of the theory of planned behaviors. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2012;55:626–640. - PubMed
    1. De Roeck EE, De Deyn PP, Dierckx E, Engelborghs S. Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019;11:21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knopman DS, Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: a clinical perspective. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89:1452–1459. - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources