Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;22(1):6-13.
doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1867934. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

Bioethics, (Funding) Priorities, and the Perpetuation of Injustice

Affiliations

Bioethics, (Funding) Priorities, and the Perpetuation of Injustice

Rachel Fabi et al. Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

If funding allocation is an indicator of a field's priorities, then the priorities of the field of bioethics are misaligned because they perpetuate injustice. Social justice mandates priority for the factors that drive systematic disadvantage, which tend not to be the areas supported by funding within academic bioethics. Current funding priorities violate social justice by overemphasizing technologies that aim to enhance the human condition without addressing underlying structural inequalities grounded in racism, and by deemphasizing areas of inquiry most frequently pursued by Scholars of Color. This lack of attention to upstream determinants of health in bioethics research perpetuates a gap in the resources needed to understand the experiences of communities disproportionately experiencing poor health, which is itself a form of epistemic injustice. Both social and epistemic injustices are apparent in the impact of these funding priorities on people of color, both in the public and in the bioethics community.

Keywords: Justice; population; priority setting; public health; race and culture/ethnicity; rationing/resource allocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

LinkOut - more resources