Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;50(6):1268-1280.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01395-2. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

The Relationship Between Dating Status and Academic and Social Functioning in Middle Adolescence

Yana Ryjova  1 , Annemarie Kelleghan  2 , Daryaneh Badaly  3 , Mylien Duong  4 , David Schwartz  2
Affiliations

The Relationship Between Dating Status and Academic and Social Functioning in Middle Adolescence

Yana Ryjova et al. J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Dating relationships are normative in middle adolescence, but the academic and social implications of different types of dating involvement remains unclear. To address this gap, this longitudinal study evaluates the association between dating status (i.e., never date, rarely date, casually date, steady relationship) and academic and social functioning in a sample of adolescents. Across two school years, 455 adolescents (53.8% female; 56.5% Asian American, 43.5% Latinx; T1 Mage = 15.04 years) reported on their dating status and peers provided nominations of popularity and aggression. Grades and standardized test scores were obtained from school records. For Asian American youth, abstaining from dating was negatively associated with subsequent popularity. Casual dating and being in a steady relationship were associated with relational and overt peer aggression over time. Gender moderated this association, such that boys in steady relationships, and girls in casual relationships were more relationally aggressive one year later. Implications are discussed in terms of problem behavior theory and adolescent intersexual competition.

Keywords: Academic functioning; Adolescence; Aggression; Peer relations; Romantic relationships.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). A multi-informant longitudinal study on the relationship between aggression, peer victimization, and dating status in adolescence. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491201000207 . - DOI
    1. Bellmore, A., Jiang, X., & Juvonen, J. (2010). Utilizing peer nominations in middle school: a longitudinal comparison between complete classroom‐based and random list methods. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00640.x . - DOI
    1. Burge, S., & Beutel, A. (2018). Gender, high school romantic involvement, and college enrollment. Social Science Quarterly, 99(3), 1134–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12493 . - DOI
    1. Carver, K., Joyner, K., & Udry, J.R. (2003). National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relationships and sexual behavior: theory, research, and practical implications (p. 291–329). Mahwah, NJ: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Cillessen, A. H., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x . - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources