A Comparison of Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Prostate Cancer Grading Guidelines
- PMID: 33481386
- DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001664
A Comparison of Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Prostate Cancer Grading Guidelines
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article.
References
-
- Epstein JI, Amin MB, Fine SW, et al. The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) white paper on contemporary grading of prostate cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020. [Epub ahead of print].
-
- van Leenders G, van der Kwast TH, Grignon DJ, et al. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44:e87–e99.
-
- Pierorazio PM, Walsh PC, Partin AW, et al. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU Int. 2013;111:753–760.
-
- Dean LW, Assel M, Sjoberg DD, et al. Clinical usefulness of total length of Gleason Pattern 4 on biopsy in men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer. J Urol. 2019;201:77–82.
-
- Cole AI, Morgan TM, Spratt DE, et al. Prognostic value of percent Gleason Grade 4 at prostate biopsy in predicting pathology and recurrence. J Urol. 2016;196:405–411.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
