A systematic review of preclinical in vivo testing of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V for orthopedic applications, part I: Animal models and bone ingrowth outcome measures
- PMID: 33484102
- DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34803
A systematic review of preclinical in vivo testing of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V for orthopedic applications, part I: Animal models and bone ingrowth outcome measures
Abstract
For Ti6Al4V orthopedic and spinal implants, osseointegration is often achieved using complex porous geometries created via additive manufacturing (AM). While AM porous titanium (pTi) has shown clinical success, concerns regarding metallic implants have spurred interest in alternative AM biomaterials for osseointegration. Insights regarding the evaluation of these new materials may be supported by better understanding the role of preclinical testing for AM pTi. We therefore asked: (a) What animal models have been most commonly used to evaluate AM porous Ti6Al4V for orthopedic bone ingrowth; (b) What were the primary reported quantitative outcome measures for these models; and (c) What were the bone ingrowth outcomes associated with the most frequently used models? We performed a systematic literature search and identified 58 articles meeting our inclusion criteria. We found that AM pTi was evaluated most often using rabbit and sheep femoral condyle defect (FCD) models. Additional ingrowth models including transcortical and segmental defects, spinal fusions, and calvarial defects were also used with various animals based on the study goals. Quantitative outcome measures determined via histomorphometry including ''bone ingrowth'' (range: 3.92-53.4% for rabbit/sheep FCD) and bone-implant contact (range: 9.9-59.7% for rabbit/sheep FCD) were the most common. Studies also used 3D imaging to report outcomes such as bone volume fraction (BV/TV, range: 4.4-61.1% for rabbit/sheep FCD), and push-out testing for outcomes such as maximum removal force (range: 46.6-3092 N for rabbit/sheep FCD). Though there were many commonalities among the study methods, we also found significant heterogeneity in the outcome terms and definitions. The considerable diversity in testing and reporting may no longer be necessary considering the reported success of AM pTi across all model types and the ample literature supporting the rabbit and sheep as suitable small and large animal models, respectively. Ultimately, more standardized animal models and reporting of bone ingrowth for porous AM materials will be useful for future studies.
Keywords: 3D printing; animal model; osseointegration; porosity; titanium.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
Incorporating simvastatin/poloxamer 407 hydrogel into 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds for the promotion of angiogenesis, osseointegration and bone ingrowth.Biofabrication. 2016 Oct 27;8(4):045012. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/4/045012. Biofabrication. 2016. PMID: 27788122
-
Does implantation site influence bone ingrowth into 3D-printed porous implants?Spine J. 2019 Nov;19(11):1885-1898. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.020. Epub 2019 Jun 28. Spine J. 2019. PMID: 31255790
-
Biomimetic Porous Ti6Al4V Implants: A Novel Interbody Fusion Cage via Gel-Casting Technique to Promote Spine Fusion.Adv Healthc Mater. 2024 Oct;13(27):e2400550. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202400550. Epub 2024 Jul 19. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024. PMID: 39031096 Free PMC article.
-
3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds for long bone repair in animal models: a systematic review.J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Feb 2;17(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02960-6. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022. PMID: 35109907 Free PMC article.
-
Bio-mechanical analysis of porous Ti-6Al-4V scaffold: a comprehensive review on unit cell structures in orthopaedic application.Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2024 Oct 14;10(6). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad8202. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2024. PMID: 39353464 Review.
Cited by
-
Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023 Oct;18(10):1783-1793. doi: 10.1007/s11548-023-02848-8. Epub 2023 Mar 1. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023. PMID: 36859520 Free PMC article.
-
Bone Regeneration with Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Scaffolds: Systematic Review of Human Clinical Trials.Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2024 May;20(4):938-966. doi: 10.1007/s12015-024-10696-5. Epub 2024 Feb 26. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2024. PMID: 38407793 Free PMC article.
-
Additively manufactured controlled porous orthopedic joint replacement designs to reduce bone stress shielding: a systematic review.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jan 16;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03492-9. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 36647070 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Bertollo N, Da Assuncao R, Hancock NJ, Lau A, Walsh WR. Influence of electron beam melting manufactured implants on ingrowth and shear strength in an ovine model. J arthroplasty. 2012;27(8):1429-1436.
-
- Walsh WR, Pelletier MH, Wang T, Lovric V, Morberg P, Mobbs RJ. Does implantation site influence bone ingrowth into 3D-printed porous implants? Spine J. 2019;19(11):1885-1898.
-
- Li J, Li Z, Shi Y, et al. In vitro and in vivo comparisons of the porous Ti6Al4V alloys fabricated by the selective laser melting technique and a new sintering technique. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;91:149-158.
-
- Wieding J, Lindner T, Bergschmidt P, Bader R. Biomechanical stability of novel mechanically adapted open-porous titanium scaffolds in metatarsal bone defects of sheep. Biomaterials. 2015;46:35-47.
-
- Li X, Feng YF, Wang CT, et al. Evaluation of biological properties of electron beam melted Ti6Al4V implant with biomimetic coating in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52049.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources