Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;142(6):1009-1030.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03767-6. Epub 2021 Jan 23.

Union rates and functional outcome of double plating of the femur: systematic review of the literature

M F Lodde  1 , M J Raschke  2 , J Stolberg-Stolberg  2 , J Everding  2 , S Rosslenbroich  2 , J C Katthagen  2
Affiliations

Union rates and functional outcome of double plating of the femur: systematic review of the literature

M F Lodde et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The optimal treatment strategy for the surgical management of femur fractures and non-unions remains unknown. The aim of this study is to assess union rates, complications and outcome after femoral double plating. Treatment of shaft, distal, periprosthetic fractures and pathological proximal femur fractures as well as femoral non-unions with double plating were evaluated.

Methods: A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was conducted. Published literature reporting on the treatment and clinical outcome of femoral fractures and non-unions with double plating was identified. In total, 24 studies with 436 cases of double plating, 64 cases of single plating, 84 cases of intramedullary nailing (IM), and 1 interfragmentary screw treatment met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. The evaluated literature was published between 1991 and 2020.

Results: Double plating of femoral fractures achieved high healing rates and few complications were reported. It displayed significantly less intraoperative haemorrhage, shorter surgery time reduced risk of malunion in polytraumatised patients when compared to IM. Fracture healing rate of double-plating distal femoral fractures was 88.0%. However, there were no significant differences regarding fracture healing, complication or functional outcome when compared to single plating. Treatment of periprosthetic fractures with double plating displayed high healing rates (88.5%). Double plating of non-unions achieved excellent osseous union rates (98.5%).

Conclusions: The literature provides evidence for superior outcomes when using double plating in distal femoral fractures, periprosthetic fractures and femoral non-unions. Some evidence suggests that the use of double plating of femoral fractures in polytraumatised patients may be beneficial over other types of fracture fixation.

Level of evidence: IV.

Keywords: Double plating; Femoral fractures; Non-union; Periprosthetic fracture; Polytrauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests, non-financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors did not receive support from any organisation for the submitted work. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. No funding was received for conducting this study. No funds, grants, or other support was received. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All the authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart showing the path from identification to inclusion of relevant literature
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Katthagen JC, Schliemann B, Michel PA, Heilmann LF, Dyrna F, Raschke MJ. Clinical application and outcomes of upper extremity double plating. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie. 2020;158:227–237. doi: 10.1055/a-0862-1070. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sanders R, Swiontkowski M, Rosen H, Helfet D. Double-plating of comminuted, unstable fractures of the distal part of the femur. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol. 1991;73:341–346. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199173030-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Müller FJ, Galler M, Füchtmeier B. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with orthogonal double plating for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop. 2014;38:2469–2472. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2464-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maimaitiyiming A, Amat A, Rehei A, Tusongjiang M, Li C. Treatment of the femoral shaft nonunion with double plate fixation and bone grafting: a case series of 14 patients. Injury. 2015;46:1102–1107. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winquist RA, Hansen ST, Clawson DK. Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol. 1984;66:529–539. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198466040-00006. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms