Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;5(3):425-435.
doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00257-8. Epub 2021 Jan 23.

The Healthcare Cost Burden in Adults with High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease

Affiliations

The Healthcare Cost Burden in Adults with High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease

Dat T Tran et al. Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: We calculated the short- and long-term care resource use and costs in adults with high-risk conditions for cardiovascular disease (HRCVD) as defined by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society dyslipidemia guidelines.

Methods: We linked Alberta health databases to identify patients aged ≥ 18 years with HRCVD between fiscal year (FY) 2012 and FY2016. The first HRCVD event was the index event. Patients were categorized into (1) primary prevention patients and (2) secondary prevention patients at the index event and were followed until death, they moved out of the province, or they were censored at March 2018. We calculated the resource use and costs for each of the 5 years after the index event.

Results: The study included 459,739 HRCVD patients (13,947 [3%] were secondary prevention patients). The secondary prevention patients were older (median age 61 years vs. 55 years; p < 0.001), and there were fewer females in this group (30.4% vs. 51.3%; p < 0.001). The total healthcare costs in the first year decreased over time (FY2012: 1.16 billion Canadian dollars (CA$); FY2016: CA$1.05 billion; p < 0.001). An HRCVD patient incurred CA$12,068, CA$5626, and CA$4655 during the first, second, and fifth year, respectively (p for trend < 0.001). During the first year, healthcare costs per secondary prevention patient (CA$36,641) were triple that for a primary prevention patient (CA$11,299; p < 0.001), primarily due to higher hospitalization costs in secondary prevention patients (CA$26,896 vs. CA$6051; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The healthcare costs for HRCVD patients were substantial but decreased over time. The costs were highest in the year following the index event and decreased thereafter. Secondary prevention patients incurred higher costs than the primary prevention patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dat Tran, Dan Palfrey, and Robert Welsh have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient selection flowchart. *(1) A patient identified in the laboratory database was reallocated to the hospital cohort if the test was conducted during hospitalization. (2) A patient identified in the ambulatory care database was reallocated to the hospital cohort if that patient was hospitalized within 1 day. (3) A patient identified in the physician database was reallocated to the hospital cohort if the claim originated from a hospitalization. FY fiscal year, HRCVD high-risk conditions for cardiovascular disease, pt patient
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Incidence and number of patients with HRCVD in Alberta, 2012–2016. HRCVD high-risk conditions for cardiovascular disease
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
First-year healthcare costs for patients with HRCVD in Alberta, in millions (2019 Canadian dollar values), 2012–2016. HRCVD high-risk conditions for cardiovascular disease
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Distribution of costs per patient by year from incidence in Alberta, 2012–2016

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heidenreich PA, et al. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(8):933–944. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820a55f5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leal J, et al. Economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in the enlarged European Union. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1610–1619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi733. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada. Tracking heart disease and stroke in Canada, 2009, viii. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2009.
    1. Collaboration CTT. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670–1681. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grundy SM, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1082–e1143. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources