Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients with High Arrhythmic Risk and an ICD: A Longitudinal Study
- PMID: 33484468
- DOI: 10.1007/s40261-020-00995-3
Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients with High Arrhythmic Risk and an ICD: A Longitudinal Study
Abstract
Purpose: Patients affected by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receive clinical and functional beneficial effects from treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. However previous studies have shown that patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) could obtain even greater benefit, but only make up a only a small proportion of patients. In the current study we evaluated the effect of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with an ICD.
Methods: Thirty-five outpatients with HFrEF (aged 60 ± 11 years, 28 were males), on optimal medical therapy were studied. All patients received an ICD at least 6 months before enrollment or were non-responders to ICD plus resynchronization (CRT-D). An open-label sacubitril/valsartan treatment was established at the maximum tolerated dose. Clinical assessment, 6-min walk test (6MWT) and echocardiography, were performed during follow-up at 90, 180, and 360 days. Quality of life score and perceived fatigue on exercise were assessed.
Results: Clinical conditions dramatically improved in most patients, especially within the first 6 months of therapy (76 % were in NYHA-I and 24 % in NYHA-II at the end of study vs 71 % NYHA-II and 29 % NYHA III at enrollment, p < 0.001). Quality of life and exercise performance significantly improved according to N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) serum levels lowering. Walking distance at 6MWT increased from 274 ± 97 to 389 ± 53 m and walking speed from 0.74 ± 0.27 to 1.07 ± 0.15 m/s (p < 0.001), while oxygen saturation did not differ significantly (from 90 ± 1 % to 91 ± 2 %). More gradual was left ventricular reverse remodeling. Ejection fraction improved mildly (+ 5 points %, p < 0.001). Global longitudinal strain and diastolic function were also assessed over time.
Conclusion: Sacubitril/valsartan therapy for HFrEF may lead to significant clinical and functional improvements even in patients with ICD at greater arrhythmic risk. Clinical improvement is obtained within the first 6 months of treatment while reverse remodeling needs more time.
References
-
- Blood AJ, Fraiche AM, Eapen ZJ. Is an admission for decompensated heart failure inevitable? Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;60:171–7. - DOI
-
- Camplain R, Kucharska-Newton A, Keyserling TC, Layton JB, Loehr L, Heiss G. incidence of heart failure observed in emergency departments, ambulatory clinics, and hospitals. Am J Cardiol. 2018;11:1328–35. - DOI
-
- Khan SS, Ning H, Shah SJ, Yancy CW, Carnethon M, Berry JD, et al. 10-year risk equations for incident heart failure in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:2388–97. - DOI
-
- Ziaeiana B, Fonarowc GC. The prevention of hospital readmissions in heart failure. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;58:379–85. - DOI
-
- Zacà V. Sacubitril/valsartan or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018;19(10):597–605. - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
