Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;6(3):e175-e183.
doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30308-X. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

Quarantine and testing strategies in contact tracing for SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Quarantine and testing strategies in contact tracing for SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study

Billy J Quilty et al. Lancet Public Health. 2021 Mar.

Erratum in

  • Correction to Lancet Public Health 2021; 6: e175-83.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Lancet Public Health. 2021 Jun;6(6):e364. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00111-0. Epub 2021 May 19. Lancet Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34019839 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: In most countries, contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases are asked to quarantine for 14 days after exposure to limit asymptomatic onward transmission. While theoretically effective, this policy places a substantial social and economic burden on both the individual and wider society, which might result in low adherence and reduced policy effectiveness. We aimed to assess the merit of testing contacts to avert onward transmission and to replace or reduce the length of quarantine for uninfected contacts.

Methods: We used an agent-based model to simulate the viral load dynamics of exposed contacts, and their potential for onward transmission in different quarantine and testing strategies. We compared the performance of quarantines of differing durations, testing with either PCR or lateral flow antigen (LFA) tests at the end of quarantine, and daily LFA testing without quarantine, against the current 14-day quarantine strategy. We also investigated the effect of contact tracing delays and adherence to both quarantine and self-isolation on the effectiveness of each strategy.

Findings: Assuming moderate levels of adherence to quarantine and self-isolation, self-isolation on symptom onset alone can prevent 37% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 12-56) of onward transmission potential from secondary cases. 14 days of post-exposure quarantine reduces transmission by 59% (95% UI 28-79). Quarantine with release after a negative PCR test 7 days after exposure might avert a similar proportion (54%, 95% UI 31-81; risk ratio [RR] 0·94, 95% UI 0·62-1·24) to that of the 14-day quarantine period, as would quarantine with a negative LFA test 7 days after exposure (50%, 95% UI 28-77; RR 0·88, 0·66-1·11) or daily testing without quarantine for 5 days after tracing (50%, 95% UI 23-81; RR 0·88, 0·60-1·43) if all tests are returned negative. A stronger effect might be possible if individuals isolate more strictly after a positive test and if contacts can be notified faster.

Interpretation: Testing might allow for a substantial reduction in the length of, or replacement of, quarantine with a small excess in transmission risk. Decreasing test and trace delays and increasing adherence will further increase the effectiveness of these strategies. Further research is required to empirically evaluate the potential costs (increased transmission risk, false reassurance) and benefits (reduction in the burden of quarantine, increased adherence) of such strategies before adoption as policy.

Funding: National Institute for Health Research, UK Research and Innovation, Wellcome Trust, EU Horizon 2021, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simulated Ct curves for ten individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 Dashed lines represent thresholds for detection probabilities and the shaded region, with boundary at Ct 30, indicates the time during which individuals are considered infectious. One of the individuals never reaches Ct 30 and hence they are considered to not be infectious; however, they will be detectable by PCR and with probability 0·3 for LFA during tε(5–13). Ct=cycle threshold. SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2. LFA=lateral flow antigen.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Transmission potential averted with quarantine-based strategies and daily testing strategies Ratio was calculated as the sum of days of secondary cases' infectious periods spent in quarantine or self-isolation divided by the sum of days of secondary cases' infectious periods. Ratios are shown for each strategy versus the baseline of 14 days' quarantine with no testing, for quarantine-based strategies (quarantine required from time of tracing until n days have passed since exposure, either with or without a test on the final day; A) and daily testing strategies (daily LFA tests without quarantine for n days from tracing, isolating only after a positive test result; B). Quarantine and self-isolation adherence were assumed to be 50% and 67%, respectively. The delay from an index case's positive test until the tracing of secondary cases was assumed to be 3 days (current average). Central bars indicate the median ratio for a given strategy, with 95% and 50% uncertainty intervals indicated by light and dark shaded bars, respectively. LFA=lateral flow antigen.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Transmission potential averted with reduced test and trace delays Ratio was calculated as the sum of days of secondary cases' infectious periods spent in quarantine or self-isolation divided by the sum of days of secondary cases' infectious periods. Ratios are shown for each strategy versus the baseline of 14 days' quarantine with no testing, for quarantine-based strategies (quarantine required from time of tracing until n days have passed since exposure, either with or without a test on the final day; A) and daily testing strategies (daily LFA tests without quarantine for n days from tracing, isolating only after a positive test result; B). Quarantine and self-isolation adherence were assumed to be 50% and 67%, respectively. The delay from an index case's positive test until the tracing of secondary cases was assumed to be 3 days (current average16) in the baseline scenario, with halved and eliminated delays investigated. Central bars indicate the median ratio for a given strategy, with 95% and 50% uncertainty intervals indicated by light and dark shaded bars, respectively. LFA=lateral flow antigen.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Transmission potential averted with increased adherence to self-isolation and quarantine Ratio was calculated as the sum of days of secondary cases' infectious periods spent in quarantine or self-isolation divided by the sum of days of secondary cases' infectious periods. Ratios are shown for each strategy versus the baseline of 14 days' quarantine with no testing, for quarantine-based strategies (quarantine required from time of tracing until n days have passed since exposure, either with or without a test on the final day; A) and daily testing strategies (daily LFA tests without quarantine for n days from tracing, isolating only after a positive test result; B). Quarantine and self-isolation adherence were assumed to be 50% and 67%, respectively, in the baseline scenario, with 100% explored for both. The delay from an index case's positive test until the tracing of secondary cases was assumed to be 3 days (current average). Central bars indicate the median ratio for a given strategy, with 95% and 50% uncertainty intervals indicated by light and dark shaded bars, respectively. LFA=lateral flow antigen.

Comment in

  • Accuracy for key parameters in modelling study.
    Yang B, Lin Y, Cowling BJ. Yang B, et al. Lancet Public Health. 2022 Jun;7(6):e494. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00085-8. Lancet Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35660209 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1199–1207. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wright L, Steptoe A, Fancourt D. What predicts adherence to COVID-19 government guidelines? Longitudinal analyses of 51,000 UK adults. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.10.19.20215376. published online Oct 21. (preprint) - DOI
    1. WHO Antigen-detection in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection using rapid immunoassays. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/antigen-detection-in-th...
    1. University of Oxford Oxford University and PHE confirm high-sensitivity of Lateral Flow Tests following extensive clinical evaluation. https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2020-11-11-oxford-university-and-phe-confirm-h...
    1. Public Health England Understanding cycle threshold (Ct) in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR: a guide for health protection terms. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cycle-threshold-ct-in-sars-co...

Publication types