Influences of the 3D microenvironment on cancer cell behaviour and treatment responsiveness: A recent update on lung, breast and prostate cancer models
- PMID: 33484910
- DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.023
Influences of the 3D microenvironment on cancer cell behaviour and treatment responsiveness: A recent update on lung, breast and prostate cancer models
Abstract
The majority of in vitro studies assessing cancer treatments are performed in two-dimensional (2D) monolayers and are subsequently validated in in vivo animal models. However, 2D models fail to accurately model the tumour microenvironment. Furthermore, animal models are not directly applicable to mimic the human scenario. Three-dimensional (3D) culture models may help to address the discrepancies of 2D and animal models. When cancer cells escape the primary tumour, they can invade at distant organs building secondary tumours, called metastasis. The development of metastasis leads to a dramatic decrease in the life expectancy of patients. Therefore, 3D systems to model the microenvironment of metastasis have also been developed. Several studies have demonstrated changes in cell behaviour and gene expression when cells are cultured in 3D compared to 2D and concluded a better comparability to cells in vivo. Of special importance is the effect seen in response to anti-cancer treatments as models are built primarily to serve as drug-testing platforms. This review highlights these changes between cancer cells grown in 2D and 3D models for some of the most common cancers including lung, breast and prostate tumours. In addition to models aiming to mimic the primary tumour site, the effects of 3D cell culturing in bone metastasis models are also described. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Most in vitro studies in cancer research are performed in 2D and are subsequently validated in in vivo animal models. However, both models possess numerous limitations: 2D models fail to accurately model the tumour microenvironment while animal models are expensive, time-consuming and can differ considerably from humans. It is accepted that the cancer microenvironment plays a critical role in the disease, thus, 3D models have been proposed as a potential solution to address the discrepancies of 2D and animal models. This review highlights changes in cell behaviour, including proliferation, gene expression and chemosensitivity, between cancer cells grown in 2D and 3D models for some of the most common cancers including lung, breast and prostate cancer as well as bone metastasis.
Keywords: 3D cancer models; Bone metastasis; Breast cancer; Extracellular matrix; Lung cancer; Prostate cancer.
Copyright © 2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Similar articles
-
Enhanced Metastatic Potential in a 3D Tissue Scaffold toward a Comprehensive in Vitro Model for Breast Cancer Metastasis.ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015 Dec 23;7(50):27810-22. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b09064. Epub 2015 Dec 8. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015. PMID: 26599258
-
Polyurethane foam scaffold as in vitro model for breast cancer bone metastasis.Acta Biomater. 2017 Nov;63:306-316. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.017. Epub 2017 Sep 18. Acta Biomater. 2017. PMID: 28927931
-
In vitro modeling of the prostate cancer microenvironment.Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014 Dec 15;79-80:214-21. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 May 9. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014. PMID: 24816064 Review.
-
Gene and miRNA expression signature of Lewis lung carcinoma LLC1 cells in extracellular matrix enriched microenvironment.BMC Cancer. 2016 Oct 11;16(1):789. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2825-9. BMC Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27729023 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in biofabrication techniques for collagen-based 3D in vitro culture models for breast cancer research.Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021 Mar;122:111944. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.111944. Epub 2021 Feb 5. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021. PMID: 33641930 Review.
Cited by
-
In silico simulations of diffusion tensors and tortuosity in cells grown on 3D-printed scaffolds for tissue engineering.RSC Adv. 2024 Oct 14;14(44):32398-32410. doi: 10.1039/d4ra05362a. eCollection 2024 Oct 9. RSC Adv. 2024. PMID: 39403166 Free PMC article.
-
Modelling acute myeloid leukemia (AML): What's new? A transition from the classical to the modern.Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2023 Aug;13(8):2110-2141. doi: 10.1007/s13346-022-01189-4. Epub 2022 Aug 5. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2023. PMID: 35930221 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biomimetic Microfluidic Platforms for the Assessment of Breast Cancer Metastasis.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Mar 11;9:633671. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.633671. eCollection 2021. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021. PMID: 33777909 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Polycaprolactone Electrospun Scaffolds Produce an Enrichment of Lung Cancer Stem Cells in Sensitive and Resistant EGFRm Lung Adenocarcinoma.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 22;13(21):5320. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215320. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34771484 Free PMC article.
-
Nano-Hydroxyapatite/PLGA Mixed Scaffolds as a Tool for Drug Development and to Study Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the Bone.Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 11;15(1):242. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010242. Pharmaceutics. 2023. PMID: 36678871 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials