Implementing interventions to reduce antibiotic use: a qualitative study in high-prescribing practices
- PMID: 33485324
- PMCID: PMC7825381
- DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01371-6
Implementing interventions to reduce antibiotic use: a qualitative study in high-prescribing practices
Abstract
Background: Trials have shown that delayed antibiotic prescriptions (DPs) and point-of-care C-Reactive Protein testing (POC-CRPT) are effective in reducing antibiotic use in general practice, but these were not typically implemented in high-prescribing practices. We aimed to explore views of professionals from high-prescribing practices about uptake and implementation of DPs and POC-CRPT to reduce antibiotic use.
Methods: This was a qualitative focus group study in English general practices. The highest antibiotic prescribing practices in the West Midlands were invited to participate. Clinical and non-clinical professionals attended focus groups co-facilitated by two researchers. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.
Results: Nine practices (50 professionals) participated. Four main themes were identified. Compatibility of strategies with clinical roles and experience - participants viewed the strategies as having limited value as 'clinical tools', perceiving them as useful only in 'rare' instances of clinical uncertainty and/or for those less experienced. Strategies as 'social tools' - participants perceived the strategies as helpful for negotiating treatment decisions and educating patients, particularly those expecting antibiotics. Ambiguities - participants perceived ambiguities around when they should be used, and about their impact on antibiotic use. Influence of context - various other situational and practical issues were raised with implementing the strategies.
Conclusions: High-prescribing practices do not view DPs and POC-CRPT as sufficiently useful 'clinical tools' in a way which corresponds to the current policy approach advocating their use to reduce clinical uncertainty and improve antimicrobial stewardship. Instead, policy attention should focus on how these strategies may instead be used as 'social tools' to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. Attention should also focus on the many ambiguities (concerns and questions) about, and contextual barriers to, using these strategies that need addressing to support wider and more consistent implementation.
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance; Antibiotics; Antimicrobial stewardship; Back-up prescription; Focus groups; General practice; Point-of-care testing.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Implementing antibiotic stewardship in high-prescribing English general practices: a mixed-methods study.Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Feb 23;73(728):e164-e175. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0298. Print 2023 Mar. Br J Gen Pract. 2023. PMID: 36823061 Free PMC article.
-
Primary care physicians' attitudes and perceptions towards antibiotic resistance and outpatient antibiotic stewardship in the USA: a qualitative study.BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 14;10(7):e034983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034983. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32665343 Free PMC article.
-
General practitioners' accounts of negotiating antibiotic prescribing decisions with patients: a qualitative study on what influences antibiotic prescribing in low, medium and high prescribing practices.BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Dec 10;20(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1065-x. BMC Fam Pract. 2019. PMID: 31823739 Free PMC article.
-
How, why and when are delayed (back-up) antibiotic prescriptions used in primary care? A realist review integrating concepts of uncertainty in healthcare.BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):2820. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20248-8. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39402467 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Balancing the risks to individual and society: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research on antibiotic prescribing behaviour in hospitals.J Hosp Infect. 2019 Apr;101(4):428-439. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Aug 9. J Hosp Infect. 2019. PMID: 30099092
Cited by
-
How can behavioural science contribute to qualitative research on antimicrobial stewardship in primary care?JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Feb 7;4(1):dlac007. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac007. eCollection 2022 Mar. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022. PMID: 35156031 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Point-of-care tests to manage acute respiratory tract infections in primary care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of healthcare professional and patient views.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Jan 3;80(1):29-46. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae349. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025. PMID: 39378128 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital Pharmacists' Viewpoint on Quality Use of Antibiotics and Resistance: A Qualitative Exploration from a Tertiary Care Hospital of Quetta City, Pakistan.Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Aug 21;12(8):1343. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12081343. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37627763 Free PMC article.
-
Antibiotics Usage and Avoidance in Germany and Poland: Attitudes and Knowledge of Patients, Physicians, and Pharmacists.Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Dec 6;13(12):1188. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13121188. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39766578 Free PMC article.
-
Virus-related Knowledge in Covid-19 Times - Results from two Cross-sectional Studies in Austria and Implications for School.Int J Biol Sci. 2022 Jan 31;18(4):1627-1650. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.69224. eCollection 2022. Int J Biol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35280678 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Public Health England. English surveillance programme for antimicrobial utilisation and resistance (ESPAUR) Report 2018–2019. [Internet]. London: Public Health England; 2019. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa...
-
- Curtis HJ, Walker AJ, Mahtani KR, Goldacre B. Time trends and geographical variation in prescribing of antibiotics in England 1998–2017. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(1):242–250. - PubMed
-
- Hope EC, Crump RE, Hollingsworth TD, Smieszek T, Robotham JV, Pouwels KB. Identifying English practices that are high antibiotic prescribers accounting for comorbidities and other legitimate medical reasons for variation. EClinicalMedicine. 2018;6:36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.12.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials