Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jan 23;18(1):18.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01087-x.

School-based gardening, cooking and nutrition intervention increased vegetable intake but did not reduce BMI: Texas sprouts - a cluster randomized controlled trial

Jaimie N Davis  1 , Adriana Pérez  2 , Fiona M Asigbee  3 , Matthew J Landry  3 , Sarvenaz Vandyousefi  3 , Reem Ghaddar  3 , Amy Hoover  3 , Matthew Jeans  3 , Katie Nikah  3 , Brian Fischer  2 , Stephen J Pont  4 , Daphne Richards  5 , Deanna M Hoelscher  6 , Alexandra E Van Den Berg  6
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

School-based gardening, cooking and nutrition intervention increased vegetable intake but did not reduce BMI: Texas sprouts - a cluster randomized controlled trial

Jaimie N Davis et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: Although school garden programs have been shown to improve dietary behaviors, there has not been a cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted to examine the effects of school garden programs on obesity or other health outcomes. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of a one-year school-based gardening, nutrition, and cooking intervention (called Texas Sprouts) on dietary intake, obesity outcomes, and blood pressure in elementary school children.

Methods: This study was a school-based cluster RCT with 16 elementary schools that were randomly assigned to either the Texas Sprouts intervention (n = 8 schools) or to control (delayed intervention, n = 8 schools). The intervention was one school year long (9 months) and consisted of: a) Garden Leadership Committee formation; b) a 0.25-acre outdoor teaching garden; c) 18 student gardening, nutrition, and cooking lessons taught by trained educators throughout the school-year; and d) nine monthly parent lessons. The delayed intervention was implemented the following academic year and received the same protocol as the intervention arm. Child outcomes measured were anthropometrics (i.e., BMI parameters, waist circumference, and body fat percentage via bioelectrical impedance), blood pressure, and dietary intake (i.e., vegetable, fruit, and sugar sweetened beverages) via survey. Data were analyzed with complete cases and with imputations at random. Generalized weighted linear mixed models were used to test the intervention effects and to account for clustering effect of sampling by school.

Results: A total of 3135 children were enrolled in the study (intervention n = 1412, 45%). Average age was 9.2 years, 64% Hispanic, 47% male, and 69% eligible for free and reduced lunch. The intervention compared to control resulted in increased vegetable intake (+ 0.48 vs. + 0.04 frequency/day, p = 0.02). There were no effects of the intervention compared to control on fruit intake, sugar sweetened beverages, any of the obesity measures or blood pressure.

Conclusion: While this school-based gardening, nutrition, and cooking program did not reduce obesity markers or blood pressure, it did result in increased vegetable intake. It is possible that a longer and more sustained effect of increased vegetable intake is needed to lead to reductions in obesity markers and blood pressure.

Clinical trials number: NCT02668744 .

Keywords: Cooking intervention; Gardening; Hispanic; Low-income; Nutrition; Obesity; Overweight; School-based.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Logic Model for Texas Sprouts Intervention to Improve Child and Parent Health
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Texas Sprouts Consort Diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adebawo O, Salau B, Ezima E, et al. Fruits and vegetables moderate lipid cardiovascular risk factor in hypertensive patients. Lipids Health Dis. 2006;5:14. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-5-14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crowe FL, Roddam AW, Key TJ, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and mortality from ischaemic heart disease: results from the European prospective investigation into Cancer and nutrition (EPIC)-heart study. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(10):1235–1243. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq465. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang X, Ouyang Y, Liu J, et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2014;349:g4490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4490. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. He K, Hu FB, Colditz GA, Manson JE, Willett WC, Liu S. Changes in intake of fruits and vegetables in relation to risk of obesity and weight gain among middle-aged women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28(12):1569–1574. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802795. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yuan S, Yu HJ, Liu MW, et al. The association of fruit and vegetable consumption with changes in weight and body mass index in Chinese adults: a cohort study. Public Health. 2018;157:121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.01.027. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data