Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;89(1-2):45-49.
doi: 10.1007/s00239-020-09984-8. Epub 2021 Jan 24.

Optimal Evolution of the Standard Genetic Code

Affiliations

Optimal Evolution of the Standard Genetic Code

Michael Yarus. J Mol Evol. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

The Standard Genetic Code (SGC) exists in every known organism on Earth. SGC evolution via early unique codon assignment, then later wobble, yields coding resembling the near-universal code. Below, later wobble is shown to also create an optimal route to accurate codon assignment. Time of optimal codon assignment matches the previously defined mean time for ordered coding, exhibiting ≥ 90% of SGC order. Accurate evolution is also accessible, sufficiently frequent to appear in populations of 103 to 104 codes. SGC-like coding capacity, code order, and accurate assignments therefore arise together, in one attainable evolutionary intermediate. Examples, which plausibly resemble coding at evolutionary domain separation, are characterized.

Keywords: Coding; Codon; Evolve; Triplet; Wobble.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Fraction of coding tables with coding capacity (≥ 20 encoded functions: left ordinate) or SGC-like assignments (0 mis, no misassignment; ≤ 1 mis, ≤ 1 misassignment; ≤ 2 mis, ≤ 2 misassignments: right ordinate), versus evolutionary time as passages. 100,000 Late wobble evolutions via Coevo_PR captures: coevolution (Wong ; Amirnovin ; Ronneberg et al. 2000) with chemical similarity (Freeland and Hurst ; Massey 2019) to direct amino acid choice. Probabilities per passage are Pmut = 0.04 for mutational capture, Pdecay = 0.04 for assignment loss, Pinit = 0.6 for initial triplet assignment, Prand = 0.1 for random assignment (Yarus 2021). b Fraction of coding tables with coding capacity (≥ 20 encoded functions: left ordinate) or with both coding capacity and accurate assignment, versus evolutionary time as passages (labeling, history ,and parameters as in a); “order” indicates mean and s.e.m. for ≥ 20 functions with joint code order ≥ 0.9 of the SGC; “mean” indicates mean and sem for ≥ 20 encoded functions (Yarus 2021). c Fraction of coding tables with coding capacity (≥ 20 encoded functions: left ordinate) or number of independent codes examined to find a code with indicated accuracy half the time (right, logarithmic ordinate), versus evolutionary time as passages (labeling, history, and parameters as in a, b, save for numbered gray arrows at bottom, which mark their leftward eras for discussion)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Evolved coding example from optimal time, with 20 encoded functions and no misassignments. Evolved for 115 passages using history and parameters as in Fig. 1a. More detail is in the text

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amirnovin R. An analysis of the metabolic theory of the origin of the genetic code. J Mol Evol. 1997;44:473–476. doi: 10.1007/PL00006170. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crick FH. Codon-anticodon pairing: the wobble hypothesis. J Mol Biol. 1966;19:548–555. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(66)80022-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Freeland SJ, Hurst LD. The genetic code is one in a million. J Mol Evol. 1998;47:238–248. doi: 10.1007/PL00006381. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grosjean H, Westhof E. An integrated, structure- and energy-based view of the genetic code. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:8020–8040. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw608. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Massey SE. Genetic code error minimization as a non-adaptive but beneficial trait. J Mol Evol. 2019;87:4–6. doi: 10.1007/s00239-018-9880-6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources