Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun:64:103012.
doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103012. Epub 2021 Jan 9.

Development and validation of a laboratory risk score for the early prediction of COVID-19 severity and in-hospital mortality

Affiliations

Development and validation of a laboratory risk score for the early prediction of COVID-19 severity and in-hospital mortality

Salam Bennouar et al. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Background and aims: Coronavirus Disease 2019 is characterized by a spectrum of clinical severity. This study aimed to develop a laboratory score system to identify high-risk individuals, to validate this score in a separate cohort, and to test its accuracy in the prediction of in-hospital mortality.

Methods: In this cohort study, biological data from 330 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients were used to develop a risk score to predict progression toward severity. In a second stage, data from 240 additional COVID-19 patients were used to validate this score. Accuracy of the score was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: In the development cohort, a step-wise decrease in the average survival duration was noted with the increment of the risk score (pANOVA < 0.0001). A similar trend was confirmed when analyzing this association in the validation cohort (p < 0.0001). The AUC was 0.74 [0.66-0.82] and 0.90 [0.87-0.94], p < 0.0001, respectively for severity and mortality prediction.

Conclusion: This study provides a useful risk score based on biological routine parameters assessed at the time of admission, which has proven its effectiveness in predicting both severity and short-term mortality of COVID-19. Improved predictive scores may be generated by including other clinical and radiological features.

Keywords: Biomarkers; COVID-19; Risk score; Severe COVID-19; Short-term mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of severe forms incidences, according to the risk score, in the development cohort (a), and in the validation cohort (b), p for trend < 0.0001 respectively.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a: Distribution of mortality rates, according to the risk score in the development cohort, p for trend < 0.0001. b: Distribution of mortality rates, according to the risk score in the validation cohort, p for trend < 0.0001. c: Average survival duration, according to the risk score in the development cohort, p ANOVA < 0.0001. d: Average survival duration, according to the risk score in the validation cohort, p ANOVA < 0.0001.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for COVID-19 severity prediction in the development cohort: the area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.95 [0.93–0.97], p < 0.0001. b: ROC curve for mortality prediction in the development cohort: AUC = 0.84 [0.78–0.89], p < 0.0001. c: ROC curve for COVID-19 severity prediction in the validation cohort: AUC = 0.74 [0.66–0.82], p < 0.0001. d: ROC curve for mortality prediction in the validation cohort: AUC = 0.90 [0.87–0.94], p < 0.0001.

References

    1. 47-Ministère de la Santé de la Population et de la Réforme Hospitalière avec la contribution du Ministère de la Poste et des Télécommunications, n.d. URL http://covid19.sante.gov.dz/fr/accueil/ (accessed 5.17.20).
    1. Barazzoni R., Bischoff S.C., Breda J., Wickramasinghe K., Krznaric Z., Nitzan D., Pirlich M., Singer P. 31-ESPEN expert statements and practical guidance for nutritional management of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin. Nutr. 2020;39:1631–1638. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.03.022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barbosa-Silva M.C.G. 7-Subjective and objective nutritional assessment methods: what do they really assess?: Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2008;11:248–254. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3282fba5d7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bennouar S., Bachir Cherif A., Kessira A., Hamel H., Boudahdir A., Bouamra A., Bennouar D., Abdi S. Usefulness of biological markers in the early prediction of corona virus disease-2019 severity. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 2020;1–8 doi: 10.1080/00365513.2020.1821396. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berger M.M., Reintam-Blaser A., Calder P.C., Casaer M., Hiesmayr M.J., Mayer K., Montejo J.C., Pichard C., Preiser J.-C., van Zanten A.R.H., Bischoff S.C., Singer P. 6-Monitoring nutrition in the ICU. Clin. Nutr. 2019;38:584–593. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.07.009. - DOI - PubMed