Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;64(11):971-978.
doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1080_20. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

Effect of reinsertion of the spinal needle stylet after spinal anaesthesia procedure on post dural puncture headache in women undergoing caesarean delivery

Affiliations

Effect of reinsertion of the spinal needle stylet after spinal anaesthesia procedure on post dural puncture headache in women undergoing caesarean delivery

Mishra Shivan et al. Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Background and aims: Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) following caesarean delivery (CD) is a cause for concern for anaesthesiologists. We aimed to study the effect of reinsertion of the stylet after spinal anaesthesia procedure, prior to spinal needle removal, on the incidence of PDPH in women undergoing CD. We also evaluated the risk factors associated with PDPH.

Methods: In this randomised, double-blind study in a tertiary care hospital, 870 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II/III women undergoing CD under spinal anaesthesia were randomly divided into-GroupA (n = 435): stylet reinsertion before spinal needle removal and Group B (n = 435): spinal needle removal without stylet reinsertion. All patients were questioned for occurrence of PDPH at various time-points. Statistical calculations were done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 17 version program for Windows.

Results: Sixty-two (7.1%) patients developed PDPH; 27 (6.2%) patients with stylet reinsertion and 35 (8.0%) patients in those with no stylet reinsertion; P = 0.389. The onset of headache was significantly delayed in patients with stylet reinsertion (16.2 ± 6.7 and 13.2 ± 4.3 h, respectively); P = 0.041 and they had greater severity of PDPH compared with those with no stylet reinsertion; P = 0.002. Factors significantly associated with PDPH were hypothyroidism, tea habituation, number of skin punctures and needle redirections, first pass success rate, occurrence of paraesthesia and contact with bone, intraoperative hypotension and time to ambulation.

Conclusions: Reinsertion of the stylet before spinal needle removal did not influence the incidence of PDPH. The onset of PDPH was delayed and the severity of headache was greater in women in whom reinsertion of the stylet was done.

Keywords: Anaesthesia; caesarean section; post dural puncture headache; spinal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram

References

    1. Patel R, Urits I, Orhurhu V, Orhurhu MS, Peck J, Ohuabunwa E. A comprehensive update on the treatment and management of postdural puncture headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020;22:24–6. - PubMed
    1. Akdemir MS, Kaydu A, Yanlı Y, Özdemir M, Gökçek E, Karaman H. The postdural puncture headache and back pain: The comparison of 26-gauge atraucan and 26-gauge quincke spinal needles in obstetric patients. Anesth Essays Res. 2017;11:458–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Puthenveettil N, Rajan S, Mohan A, Paul J, Kumar L. Sphenopalatine ganglion block for treatment of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients: An observational study. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62:972–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Syed S, Qayoom N, Naaz S, Mushtaq K, Mir SH, Bijli AH, et al. Comparison of post-dural puncture headache- incidence and severity in obstetric patients after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section with 25G and 27G Quincke needle. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5:596–600.
    1. Strupp M, Brandt T, Müller A. Incidence of post-lumbar puncture syndrome reduced by reinserting the stylet: A randomized prospective study of 600 patients. J Neurol. 1998;245:589–92. - PubMed