Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 16;44(6):1663-1673.
doi: 10.3906/kim-2007-67. eCollection 2020.

Comparison of antioxidant capacities and antioxidant components of commercial bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.) products

Affiliations

Comparison of antioxidant capacities and antioxidant components of commercial bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.) products

Esin AkyÜz et al. Turk J Chem. .

Abstract

In this study, the total phenolic contents and total antioxidant capacities of some commercial bitter melon products (powder, packaged powder, capsule, paste in olive oil), and of unripe and ripe fruits were determined by spectrophotometric and chromatographic methods. The total antioxidant capacities of unripe and ripe bitter melon samples, determined by using the CUPRAC (cupric reducing antioxidant capacity assay) and ABTS (2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazolin-6-sulfonic acid))/HRP (horseradish peroxidase) methods, were 42.5 and 36.3 µmol TRE (Trolox equivalent) g-1, and 8.7 and 7.0 µmol TRE g-1, respectively. The TAC (total antioxidant capacity) order of the studied samples using the same 2 methods were determined as follows: capsule (CUPRAC value, 140.8; ABTS/HRP value, 143.6 µmol TRE g-1) > packaged powder (129.6; 126.1) > powder (52.3; 64.3) > unripe fruit (42.5; 36.3) > paste in olive oil (17.6; 14.4) > ripe fruit (8.7; 7.0). The order of phenolic content was found as follows: unripe fruit (193.2 µmol GAE (gallic acid equivalent) g-1) > capsule (162.0) > packaged powder (160.6) > powder (83.6) > paste in olive oil (38.3) > ripe fruit (14.6).

Keywords: ABTS; CUPRAC; HPLC; Momordica charantia; bitter melon; total antioxidant capacity; total phenolic content.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: none declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Spectra of extracts of powdered bitter melon sample containing MeOH-water (A) and EtOH-water (B) in different proportions (100%, 80%, 50%), and the comparison of the spectra of 80% MeOH-water and 80% EtOH-water (C) extracts.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of CUPRAC (μmol TRE g–1), ABTS/HRP (μmol TRE g–1), and Folin (μmol GAE g–1), method findings of bitter melon samples.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Chromatograms (at 270 nm) of the synthetic mixture containing various antioxidant standards (A), 80% MeOH (v/v) extracts of unripe fruit (B), ripe fruit (C), powder (D), and capsule products (1: Gallic acid, 2: Gentisic acid, 3: Catechin, 4: Vanilic acid, 5: Chlorogenic acid, 6: Syringic acid, 7: Epicatechin, 8: p-Coumaric acid, 9: Benzoic acid, 10: Rutin, 11: Quercetin).

References

    1. Joseph B Jini D. Antidiabetic effects of Momordica charantia (bitter melon) and its medicinal potency. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease. 2013;3:93–102.
    1. El Batran SAES El-Gengaihi SE El Shabrawya OA. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2006;108:236–242. - PubMed
    1. Krishnaiah D Sarbatly R Nithyanandam R. A review of the antioxidant potential of medicinal plant species. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2011;89:217–233.
    1. Wang L Clardy A Hui D Gao A Wu Y Antioxidant and antidiabetic properties of Chinese and Indian bitter melons (Momordica charantia L.) Food Bioscience. 2019;29:73–80.
    1. Production of structured lipids with canola oil and bitter gourd fatty acids (clna) and optimization of reaction conditions. MSc. 2009.

LinkOut - more resources