Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 5;12(1):39-47.
doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00369. eCollection 2021 Jan 14.

Studying Histone Deacetylase Inhibition and Apoptosis Induction of Psammaplin A Monomers with Modified Thiol Group

Affiliations

Studying Histone Deacetylase Inhibition and Apoptosis Induction of Psammaplin A Monomers with Modified Thiol Group

Yu Bao et al. ACS Med Chem Lett. .

Abstract

Psammaplin A (PsA) is a bromotyrosine disulfide dimer with histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition and acts through reduced monomer PsA-SH. We studied the connection of HDAC inhibition, cell growth inhibition, and apoptosis induction of PsA-SH by modifying the -SH group with deletion (6a) or replacement with hydroxamic acid (10b) or benzamide (12g). PsA-SH inhibits HDAC1/2/3 and 6a loses the HDAC inhibition ability. 10b inhibits HDAC1/2/3/6 while 12g shows selective inhibition of HDAC3. PsA-SH and 10b, but neither 6a nor 12g, induce apoptosis in human leukemia HL-60 cells associated with increased acetylation of Histone H3. PsA-SH and 10b inhibit growth of several solid tumor cell lines in vitro and Lewis lung cancer cell growth in vivo. PsA-SH is a simple scaffold for developing selective HDAC inhibitors and induces apoptosis through inhibiting HDAC1/2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Chemical structures of Psammaplin A (PsA), Psammaplin A monomer (PsA-SH), and approved HDAC inhibitors.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Synthesis of PsA Monomer with a Different ZBG
Reagents and conditions: (a) Imidazolidine-2,4-dione, NaHCO3, H2O, 120 °C, 10 h, 83–92%; (b) NaOH, N2, H2O, 95 °C, 12 h, 65–73%; (c) NaOH, NaHCO3, HONH2·HCl, H2O, r.t., 12 h, 70–84%; (d) HOBt, EDCI, DIEA, DMF, 10 h, 30–47%; (e) DTT, KOH, MeOH, r.t., 30 min; (f) SOCl2, MeOH, Et2O, r.t., 3 h, 74–83%; (g) LiAlH4, THF, r.t., 1 h; (h) HONH2·H2O, NaOH, MeOH, r.t., 30 min, 73–88%; (i) NaOH, MeOH, 60 °C, 30 min, 90–95%.
Figure 2
Figure 2
FACS and Western blot analyses of apoptosis induction by PsA and PsA-SH in HL-60 cells. (A) HL-60 cells were treated with PsA and PsA-SH at the indicated concentrations for 24 h, and apoptotic cells were determined by FACS after staining with PI/Annexin-V. (B) Western blot analysis of the protein levels of Ac-H3, H3, Ac-α-tubulin, α-tubulin, PARP, caspase-3, -8, -9, and β-actin of HL-60 cells treated with PsA and PsA-SH for 24 h.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Apoptosis and H3 acetylation levels of HL-60 cells treated with 6a, 9, and 11b. Apoptotic cells were determined by FACS after staining with PI/Annexin-V (A), and the acetylated levels of H3 and α-tubulin were measured with Western blot (B) in HL-60 cells treated with each compound at 20 μM for 24 h.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Apoptosis induction and protein regulation by 10b and Tubacin. Apoptotic cells were determined by FACS after staining with PI/Annexin-V (A), and the protein levels of Ac-H3, Ac-α-tubulin, PARP, caspase-3, -8, -9, and β-actin were determined by Western blotting (B) in HL-60 cells treated with 10b and Tubacin at the indicated concentrations for 24 h.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Apoptosis induction and protein regulation by 12e, 12f, and RGFP966 in HL-60 cells. Apoptotic cells were determined by FACS after staining with PI/Annexin-V (A), and the protein levels of Ac-H3, Ac-α-tubulin, PARP, caspase-3, -8, -9, and β-actin were determined by Western blotting (B) in HL-60 cells treated with 12e, 12f, and RGFP966 for 24 h.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Putative binding patterns of PsA-SH (A) or 12g (B) within HDAC1 (left panel, green) and HDAC3 (right panel, blue) pockets.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith B. C.; Denu J. M. Chemical mechanisms of histone lysine and arginine modifications. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gene Regul. Mech. 2009, 1789, 45–57. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2008.06.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garmpis N.; Damaskos C.; Garmpi A.; Dimitroulis D.; Spartalis E.; Margonis G. A.; Schizas D.; Deskou I.; Doula C.; Magkouti E.; Andreatos N.; Antoniou E. A.; Nonni A.; Kontzoglou K.; Mantas D. Targeting Histone Deacetylases in Malignant Melanoma: A Future Therapeutic Agent or Just Great Expectations?. Anticancer research 2017, 37, 5355–5362. - PubMed
    1. Bezecny P. Histone deacetylase inhibitors in glioblastoma: pre-clinical and clinical experience. Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) 2014, 31, 985.10.1007/s12032-014-0985-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taunton J.; Hassig C. A.; Schreiber S. L. A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 1996, 272, 408–11. 10.1126/science.272.5260.408. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xu W. S.; Parmigiani R. B.; Marks P. A. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: molecular mechanisms of action. Oncogene 2007, 26, 5541–52. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210620. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources