Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 8:8:562251.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.562251. eCollection 2020.

Clinical Aspects of Neonatal Hypoglycemia: A Mini Review

Affiliations
Review

Clinical Aspects of Neonatal Hypoglycemia: A Mini Review

Taygen Edwards et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

Introduction: Neonatal hypoglycemia is common and a preventable cause of brain damage. The goal of management is to prevent or minimize brain injury. The purpose of this mini review is to summarize recent advances and current thinking around clinical aspects of transient neonatal hypoglycemia. Results: The groups of babies at highest risk of hypoglycemia are well defined. However, the optimal frequency and duration of screening for hypoglycemia, as well as the threshold at which treatment would prevent brain injury, remains uncertain. Continuous interstitial glucose monitoring in a research setting provides useful information about glycemic control, including the duration, frequency, and severity of hypoglycemia. However, it remains unknown whether continuous monitoring is associated with clinical benefits or harms. Oral dextrose gel is increasingly being recommended as a first-line treatment for neonatal hypoglycemia. There is some evidence that even transient and clinically undetected episodes of neonatal hypoglycemia are associated with adverse sequelae, suggesting that prophylaxis should also be considered. Mild transient hypoglycemia is not associated with neurodevelopmental impairment at preschool ages, but is associated with low visual motor and executive function, and with neurodevelopmental impairment and poor literacy and mathematics achievement in later childhood. Conclusion: Our current management of neonatal hypoglycemia lacks a reliable evidence base. Randomized trials are required to assess the effects of different prophylactic and treatment strategies, but need to be adequately powered to assess outcomes at least to school age.

Keywords: child development; continuous glucose monitoring; diagnosis; insulin; newborn; oral dextrose gel; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Hay WW, Raju TNK, Higgins RD, Kalhan SC, Devaskar SU. Knowledge gaps and research needs for understanding and treating neonatal hypoglycemia: workshop report from Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. J Pediatr. (2009) 155:612–7. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.06.044 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris D, Weston PJ, Harding JE. Incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia in babies identified as at risk. J Pediatr. (2012) 161:787–91. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.05.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boluyt N, van Kempen A, Offringa M. Neurodevelopment after neonatal hypoglycemia: a systematic review and design of an optimal future study. Pediatrics. (2006) 117:2231–43. 10.1542/peds.2005-1919 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah R, Harding JE, Brown J, McKinlay C. Neonatal glycaemia and neurodevelopmental outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology. (2019) 115:116–26. 10.1159/000492859 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schneider H, Reiber W, Sager R, Malek A. Asymmetrical transport of glucose across the in vitro perfused human placenta. Placenta. (2003) 24:27–33. 10.1053/plac.2002.0869 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources