Potential diabetes overtreatment and risk of adverse events among older adults in Ontario: a population-based study
- PMID: 33491105
- DOI: 10.1007/s00125-020-05370-7
Potential diabetes overtreatment and risk of adverse events among older adults in Ontario: a population-based study
Abstract
Aims/hypothesis: More than 25% of older adults (age ≥75 years) have diabetes and may be at risk of adverse events related to treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of intensive glycaemic control in this group, potential overtreatment among older adults and the impact of overtreatment on the risk of serious events.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study of community-dwelling older adults in Ontario using administrative data. Participants were ≥75 years of age with diagnosed diabetes treated with at least one anti-hyperglycaemic agent between 2014 and 2015. Individuals were categorised as having intensive or conservative glycaemic control (HbA1c <53 mmol/mol [<7%] or 54-69 mmol/mol [7.1-8.5%], respectively), and as undergoing treatment with high-risk (i.e. insulin, sulfonylureas) or low-risk (other) agents. We measured the composite risk of emergency department visits, hospitalisations, or death within 30 days of reaching intensive glycaemic control with high-risk agents.
Results: Among 108,620 older adults with diagnosed diabetes in Ontario, the mean (± SD) age was 80.6 (±4.5) years, 49.7% were female, and mean (± SD) diabetes duration was 13.7 (±6.3) years. Overall, 61% of individuals were treated to intensive glycaemic control and 21.6% were treated to intensive control using high-risk agents. Using inverse probability treatment weighting with propensity scores, intensive control with high-risk agents was associated with nearly 50% increased risk of the composite outcome compared with conservative glycaemic control with low-risk agents (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.08, 2.05).
Conclusions/interpretation: Our findings underscore the need to re-evaluate glycaemic targets in older adults and to reconsider the use of anti-hyperglycaemic medications that may lead to hypoglycaemia, especially in setting of intensive glycaemic control.
Keywords: Diabetes overtreatment; Healthcare delivery; Hypoglycaemia; Insulin secretagogues; Insulin therapy; Intensive glycaemic control; Older adults.
References
-
- Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H (2004) Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27(5):1047–1053. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lipscombe LL, Hux JE (2007) Trends in diabetes prevalence, incidence, and mortality in Ontario, Canada 1995-2005: a population-based study. Lancet 369(9563):750–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60361-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cheng YJ, Imperatore G, Geiss LS et al (2013) Secular changes in the age-specific prevalence of diabetes among U.S. adults: 1988-2010. Diabetes Care 36(9):2690–2696. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2074 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- (1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 352(9131):837–853. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAMCol.14Aug.1998
-
- Boucher BJ (1998) Inadequate vitamin D status: does it contribute to the disorders comprising syndrome ‘X’? Br J Nutr 79(4):315–327
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
