Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Mar;100(3):763-777.
doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04428-9. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

Impact of donor and recipient Epstein-Barr Virus serostatus on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Impact of donor and recipient Epstein-Barr Virus serostatus on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Michalina Kołodziejczak et al. Ann Hematol. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative therapeutic strategy that showed encouraging long-term outcomes in hematological diseases. A number of factors can influence post-transplant clinical outcomes. While Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) constitutes a trigger for development of various adverse conditions, no clinical study yet has been powered to assess the effect of EBV serostatus on the clinical outcomes in allo-HCT population. To systematically summarize and analyze the impact of donor and recipient EBV serostatus on transplant outcomes in allo-HCT recipients, meta-analyses were conducted. Selected endpoints were overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), and de novo cGVHD. Three studies with 26,650 patients, transplanted for acute leukemias, lymphomas, chronic hematological malignancies, or non-malignant hematological diseases were included in the meta-analysis. In the whole population, with a total of 53,300 donors and recipients, the rate of EBV seropositivity was 85.1%, including 86.6% and 83.6% among transplant recipients and healthy donors, respectively. Donor EBV seropositivity increased the risk of cGVHD by 17%, de novo cGVHD by 14%, and aGHVD by 5%. Recipient EBV seropositivity increased the risk of cGVHD by 12%, de novo cGVHD by 17%; increased NRM by 11%, increased RI by 11%, decreased OS by 14%, and decreased RFS by 11%. In performed meta-analyses, donor and recipient EBV seropositivity was found to have a significant impact on transplant outcomes in patients after allo-HCT.

Keywords: EBV; Epstein-Barr virus; GVHD; Graft-versus-host disease; HCT; Hematopoietic cell transplantation; Non-relapse mortality; Overall survival; Relapse incidence; Relapse-free survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Individual and summary risk ratios with 95% CIs for the outcome of aGVHD in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation stratified by donor and recipient EBV serostatus
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Individual and summary risk ratios with 95% CIs for the outcome of cGVHD in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation stratified by donor and recipient EBV serostatus
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Individual and summary risk ratios with 95% CIs for the outcome of de novo cGVHD in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation stratified by donor and recipient EBV serostatus
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Individual and summary risk ratios with 95% CIs for the outcome of NRM in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation stratified by donor and recipient EBV serostatus
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Individual and summary risk ratios with 95% CIs for the outcome of OS in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation stratified by donor and recipient EBV serostatus
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Individual and summary risk ratios with 95% CIs for the outcome of RFS in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation stratified by donor and recipient EBV serostatus
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Individual and summary risk ratios with 95% CIs for the outcome of RI in patients undergoing hematopoietic allogeneic cell transplantation stratified by donor and recipient EBV serostatus

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cohen JI. Epstein-Barr virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(7):481–492. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008173430707. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balfour HH, Jr, Verghese P. Primary Epstein-Barr virus infection: impact of age at acquisition, coinfection, and viral load. J Infect Dis. 2013;207(12):1787–1789. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit096. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Styczynski J. Managing post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Exp Opin Orphan Drugs. 2017;5(1):19–35. doi: 10.1080/21678707.2017.1262256. - DOI
    1. Styczynski J, van der Velden W, Fox CP, Engelhard D, de la Camara R, Cordonnier C, Ljungman P. Management of Epstein-Barr Virus infections and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Sixth European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-6) guidelines. Haematologica. 2016;101(7):803–811. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.144428. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sundin M, Le Blanc K, Ringden O, Barkholt L, Omazic B, Lergin C, Levitsky V, Remberger M. The role of HLA mismatch, splenectomy and recipient Epstein-Barr virus seronegativity as risk factors in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2006;91(8):1059–1067. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources