Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep-Oct;46(5):289-296.
doi: 10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000311.

Supported Communication Video Training for the Nursing Department in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospital

Affiliations

Supported Communication Video Training for the Nursing Department in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospital

Michelle Armour et al. Rehabil Nurs. 2021 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop a valid educational intervention to improve knowledge and confidence using communication strategies when interacting with a person with aphasia.

Design: A quantitative, nonrandomized pretest/posttest research study was performed.

Methods: Pre- and postcourse assessments were completed with learning participants. This educational intervention was developed using the underlying theoretical concepts of the integrated behavioral model.

Results: Forty-nine new employees from the nursing department participated in this study, with 61% reporting less than 1 year of experience. Pre- to posttraining assessments on the Test of Knowledge of Aphasia improved from 3.7 to 5.8 (p ≤ .0001) for direct knowledge, from 5.5 to 8.2 (p ≤ .0001) for confidence self-efficacy, and from 5.3 to 7.6 (p ≤ .0001) for knowledge self-efficacy.

Conclusion: Results indicated this theory-driven educational training was effective in training employees from the nursing department working in an inpatient rehabilitation environment.

Clinical relevancy: Improving communication effectiveness is critical for overall quality of care and patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Integrated Behavioral Model Construct Statements Administered (5-Point Likert Scale).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Years of Experience.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Years of Experience Working With Individuals Following A Stroke.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Prior Aphasia Training.

References

    1. Brady S. L. Rao N. Gibbons P. J. Williams L. Hakel M., & Pape T. (2018). Face-to-face versus online training for the interpretation of findings in the fiberoptic endoscopic exam of the swallow procedure. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 9, 433–441. 10.2147/AMEP.S142947 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doogan C. Dignam J. Copland D., & Leff A. (2018). Aphasia recovery: When, how and who to treat? Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 18(12), 90. 10.1007/s11910-018-0891-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fridriksson J. den Ouden D. B. Hillis A. E. Hickok G. Rorden C. Basilakos A. Yourganov G., & Bonilha L. (2018). Anatomy of aphasia revisited. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 141(3), 848–862. 10.1093/brain/awx363 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glanz K. Rimer B., & Viswanath K. (2015). Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice. Wiley.
    1. Heard R. O’Halloran R., & McKinley K. (2017). Communication partner training for health care professionals in an inpatient rehabilitation setting: A parallel randomised trial. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(3), 277–286. 10.1080/17549507.2017.1290137 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources