Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 1;91(3):293-300.
doi: 10.2319/052220-465.1.

Does the rhythm and appliance type of rapid maxillary expansion have an effect on root resorption?

Does the rhythm and appliance type of rapid maxillary expansion have an effect on root resorption?

Sıddık Malkoç et al. Angle Orthod. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the volume, amount, and localization of root resorption in the upper first premolars by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) after three different rapid maxillary expansion appliances and two different activation rhythms.

Materials and methods: The patients were divided into three groups; Hyrax, acrylic cap splint (ACS), and full coverage acrylic bonded (FCAB) appliances. Each group was then divided into the following two subgroups: rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and semirapid maxillary expansion (SRME). After expansion was completed, the appliances were stabilized for 12 weeks during the retention period. For each group, 10 premolars (for a total of 60 premolars) were scanned with the micro-CT (SkyScan). The reconstructed 3D images of each root sample were divided into six regions. The resorption craters on these six different root surfaces were analyzed by special CTAn (SkyScan) software for direct volumetric measurements. Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The total volume of root resorption was less with FCAB than with ACS and Hyrax (P < .001). In all groups, a greater volume of resorption was found on the buccal surface than on the lingual surface (P < .001). No significant differences were found between the RME and SRME groups (P > .05).

Conclusions: All expansion appliances caused root resorption in the upper first premolar teeth, but FCAB may be safer in terms of root resorption. The resorption craters were generally concentrated on the buccal surface. There was no effect of activation rhythm on root resorption.

Keywords: Micro-CT; Rapid maxillary expansion; Root resorption; Semirapid maxillary expansion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Appliances used in this study. (a) Hyrax appliance. (b) Acrylic cap splint appliance. (c) Full coverage acrylic bonded appliance.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Micro-CT image of maxillary first premolar.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Separation of the root vertically in three sections (apical, middle, cervical) and horizontally in two sections (buccal, lingual). BC indicates buccal cervical; LC, lingual cervical; BM, buccal middle; LM, lingual middle; BA, buccal apical; LA, lingual apical.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
CTAn 1.15.4.0 (Skyscan, Kontich, Belgium) software, isolation of resorption crater from the root surface.

References

    1. İşeri H, Özsoy S. Semirapid maxillary expansion: a study of long-term transverse effects in older adolescents and adults. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:71–78. - PubMed
    1. Orhan M, Üsümez S, Malkoç S. Modified bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance. World J Orthod. 2003;4:119–125.
    1. McNamara JA. Maxillary transverse deficiency. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:567–570. - PubMed
    1. Almuazin M, Short L, Isherwood G, Almuazin L, McDonald J. Rapid maxillary expansion: a review of appliance designs, biomechanics and clinical aspects. Orthod Update. 2016;9:90–95.
    1. Isaacson RJ, Ingram AH. Forces produced by rapid maxillary expansion. Part II. Forces present during treatment. Angle Orthod. 1964;34:261–269. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources